Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold’s Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pone.0313812 · Paper page
Abstract
This study explored the difference between predicted structure confidence and disorder detection in protein, focusing on regions with undefined structures detected as missing segments in X-ray crystallography and Cryo-EM data. Recognizing the importance of these ‘unstructured’ regions for protein functionality, we examined the alignment of numerous protein sequences with their resolved or not structures. The research utilized a comprehensive PDB dataset, classifying residues into ‘modeled’, ‘hard missing’ and ‘soft missing’ based on their visibility in structural data. By analysis, key features were firstly determined, including confidence score pLDDT from Al-phaFold2, an advanced AI-based tool, and IUPred, a conventional disorder prediction method. Our analysis reveals that "hard missing" residues often reside in low-confidence regions, but are not exclusively associated with disorder predictions. It was assessed how effectively individual key features can distinguish between structured and unstructured data, as well as the potential benefits of combining these features for advanced machine learning applications. This approach aims to uncover varying correlations across different experimental methodologies in the latest structural data. By analyzing the relationships between predictions and experimental structures, we can more effectively identify structural targets within proteins, guiding experimental designs toward areas of potential functional significance, whether they exhibit high stability or crucial unstructured regions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Zheng, S.
- Affiliations
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Sen
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-11-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0313812-e0313812
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11936262
- OpenAlex
- W4408818695
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein structural disorder, AlphaFold2, pLDDT, unstructured regions, protein structure prediction, X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Computational Biology, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Databases, Protein, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review