Recommended Interventions for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Delivery in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Background: Existing enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) professional society recommendations lack intersociety collaboration, multidisciplinary expert input and involvement of patient stakeholders. This initiative aimed to develop a multidisciplinary set of ERAC interventions endorsed by relevant US professional societies and patient representatives. Methods: This American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) led initiative received IRB approval from Stanford University. In total 19 stakeholders were invited to participate in this Delphi study, including 13 representatives from 8 US professional societies (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA - 1 representative), Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP - 2), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG - 4), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM - 1), Society of OBGYN Hospitalists (SOGH - 1), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society (ERAS Society - 1), Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses ((AWHONN -2), American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA - 1), a physical therapist, a lactation expert and 4 patient representatives from diverse backgrounds. A three-round modified Delphi approach was conducted (2 rounds of electronic questionnaires and a 3 rd round of e-discussion), to produce the final set of ERAC recommendations. An initial list of 70 interventions was compiled based on a previously published systematic review of ERAC studies and professional society guidelines/recommendations (ERAS Society, SOAP, and Healthcare Canada). Consensus was obtained for the final list of interventions, with strong consensus defined as ≥70% agreement and weak consensus as 50–69% agreement. Results: All professional societies that were approached provided content-expert stakeholders to participate, and all stakeholders completed all rounds of the Delphi process. A final set of 32 interventions (6 preoperative, 13 intraoperative and 13 postoperative) achieved strong consensus. Conclusions: This US intersociety and multidisciplinary Delphi study resulted in a list of ERAC interventions, which should be considered when implementing ERAC within US labor and delivery units.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 2024 Delphi review was used to determine the appropriate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions.
“A 2024 Delphi review (Recommended Interventions for Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Delivery in the United States) was used to determine the appropriate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions.9”
From Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations (part 1)—2025 update (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the <scp>WHO</scp> vision
Tunçalp, Ӧ., Were, W., MacLennan, C., Oladapo, O., Gülmezoglu, A., Bahl, R., Daelmans, B., Mathai, M., Say, L., Kristensen, F., et al. (2015) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13451 · Cited by 1,101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“42 Furthermore, there appears to be inconsistent use of SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines among these published studies.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sultan, P., Monks, D. T., Sharawi, N., Bamber, J., Panelli, D. M., Sauro, K. M., Shah, P. S., Muraca, G. M., Metcalfe, A., Wood, S. L., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.038 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationWilson, R. D., Monks, D. T., Sharawi, N., Bamber, J., Panelli, D. M., Sauro, K. M., Shah, P. S., Muraca, G. M., Metcalfe, A., Wood, S. L., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.014 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sultan, P., Zakowski, M., Joudi, K., Singh, D., Gregory, K. D., Lyell, D., Carvalho, B., & Study investigators
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Torrance Memorial Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sultan, Pervez
- Venue
- medRxiv
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- OpenAlex
- W4404121219
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Society For Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL166253-01A1)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD113142-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- cesarean section, multidisciplinary consensus, professional society recommendations, patient representatives, preoperative care, intraoperative care, postoperative care, labor and delivery unit, Delphi consensus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review