PreprintCited by 2Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer-related gene regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normalized and Directional Interplay Scoring for the Interrogation of Proteoform Data

Open access
Poncha, Karl F, Paparella, Alyssa T., Young, Nicolas L.·2024·Journal of Proteome Research

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00877

Abstract

Histone proteoforms, often presenting multiple co-occurring post-translational modifications (PTMs), are central to chromatin regulation and gene expression. A proteoform is a specific form of a protein that includes variations arising from genetic changes, alternative RNA splicing, proteolytic processing, and PTMs. Genomic context-dependent histone proteoforms define the histone code, influencing cellular phenotype by dictating interactions with DNA and chromatin-associated proteins. Understanding the dynamics of histone proteoforms is essential for elucidating chromatin-based regulatory mechanisms. Advances in middle-down and top-down proteomics methods enable accurate identification and quantitation of hundreds to thousands of proteoforms in a single run. However, the resulting data complexity presents significant challenges for analysis and visualization. Here, we introduce new computational methods to analyze the dynamics of histone PTMs and demonstrate their use in mouse organs during aging. We have developed and benchmarked two novel PTM crosstalk scores. The score that we term ‘Normalized Interplay’ addresses limitations of the original crosstalk score ‘Interplay’ providing a more complete and accurate measure of PTM crosstalk. The second score, ‘delta I’ or Directional Interplay is an asymmetric measure quantifying the magnitude and directionality of crosstalk between PTMs. Applying our two-stage scoring approach to data from CrosstalkDB, a community resource that curates proteoform-level data, reveals the dynamics of histone H3 modifications during aging. The source code is available under an Apache license at https://github.com/k-p4/ptm_interplay_scoring .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.18.624157

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1038/nmeth.2369 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1042/BCJ20200170 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s13361-019-02350-z · DOI
  4. 10.1186/s13072-024-00536-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s13072-018-0198-9 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/15592294.2018.1475979 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/mcp.M114.046441 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pmic.201300438 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00414 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/pr050266a · DOI
  11. 10.1074/mcp.M900238-MCP200 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00894 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/pmic.201400569 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/pmic.201700442 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/mcp.O113.036335 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.01.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkx696 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.1205707109 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.02.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/pr200740a · DOI
  21. 10.15252/embj.201490834 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41598-020-74939-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.011 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01164 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.060 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.008 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/s13287-015-0131-0 · DOI
  28. 10.7554/eLife.82596 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107527 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Poncha, K. F., Paparella, A. T., & Young, N. L.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Nicolas L.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
1765-1777
ISSN
1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408031160
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (GT16569)
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01ag085751-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG085751, R01AG074540, P01AG066606)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA193235, R01CA276663)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM139295)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS136375)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer-related gene regulation
Keywords
post-translational modification, PTM crosstalk, histone code, histone H3 modifications, aging, mouse organs, chromatin regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review