PreprintCited by 1Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Reproductive BiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular evolution of a reproductive barrier in maize and related species

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/genetics/iyaf085 · Paper page

Abstract

Three cross-incompatibility loci each control a distinct reproductive barrier in both domesticated maize ( Zea mays ssp. mays ) and its wild teosinte relatives. These three loci, Teosinte crossing barrier1 ( Tcb1 ), Gametophytic factor1 ( Ga1 ), and Ga2 , each play a key role in preventing hybridization between incompatible populations and are proposed to maintain the barrier between domesticated and wild subspecies. Each locus encodes both a silk-active and a matching pollen-active pectin methylesterase (PMEs). To investigate the diversity and molecular evolution of these gametophytic factor loci, we identified existing and improved models of the responsible genes in a new genome assembly of maize line P8860 that contains active versions of all three loci. We then examined fifty-two assembled genomes from seventeen species to classify haplotype diversity and identify sites under diversifying selection during the evolution of these genes. We show that Ga2 , the oldest of these three loci, was duplicated to form Ga1 at least 12 million years ago. Tcb1 , the youngest locus, arose as a duplicate of Ga1 before or around the time of diversification of the Zea genus. We find evidence of positive selection during evolution of the functional genes at an active site in the pollen-expressed PME and predicted surface sites in both the silk- and pollen-expressed PMEs. The most common allele at the Ga1 locus is a conserved ga1 allele ( ga1-Off ), which is specific haplotype containing three full-length PME gene copies, all of which are non-coding due to conserved stop codons and are between 610 thousand and 1.5 million years old. We show that the ga1-Off allele is associated with and likely generates 24-nt siRNAs in developing pollen-producing tissue, and these siRNAs map to functional Ga1 alleles. In previously-published crosses, the ga1-Off allele was associated with reduced function of the typically dominant functional alleles for the Ga1 and Tcb1 barriers. Taken together, this seems to be an example of a type of epigenetic trans-homolog silencing known as paramutation functioning at a locus controlling a reproductive barrier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.12.02.626474

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.26508/lsa.201900429 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/2024.04.30.591904 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108577 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/nph.13424 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bapat, Amruta R. , Adrienne N. Moran Lauter , Matthew B. Hufford , Nicholas A. Boerman , and M. Paul Scott . 2023. “The Ga1 Locus of the Genus Zea Is Associated with Novel Genome Structures Derived from Multiple, Independent Nonhomologous Recombination Events.” G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 13 (11): jkad196. · DOI
  6. 10.1093/plphys/kiae536 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF02982255 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/genetics/41.6.872 · DOI
  9. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-080620-102159 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/gigascience/gix120 · DOI
  11. 10.2134/agronj1936.00021962002800120002x · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41467-022-29729-z · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/plcell/koad010 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/evo.14565 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/molbev/msi228 · DOI
  17. 1901, Bastarde Zwischen Maisrassem, Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung Der Xenien, Bibliotheca Botanica, 10, 53
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05005.x · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011296 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF01742059 · DOI
  21. 10.1105/tpc.104.028886 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/aob/mcr017 · DOI
  23. 10.11646/phytotaxa.429.2.6 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41467-022-34630-w · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s001220100549 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x · DOI
  27. 1996, The Coevolution of Gene Family Trees, Trends in Genetics: TIG, 12, 364, 10.1016/S0168-9525(96)80020-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/9781119717003.ch2 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/nph.20263 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/tpj.16123 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nrg.2016.115 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.abg5289 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02372-4 · DOI
  34. 1990, Cross-Incompatibility between Maize and Teosinte, Maydica, 35, 399
  35. 2006, The Gametophyte-1 Locus and Reproductive Isolation among Zea Mays Subspecies, Maydica, 51, 219
  36. 10.1534/genetics.105.048645 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s00497-005-0012-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/jhered/esq090 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/molbev/msz197 · DOI
  40. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0528 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB301 · DOI
  42. 10.7554/eLife.76968 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41467-019-10259-0 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/genetics/11.5.423 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/mol-bev/msab199 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/cpz1.323 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.06.023 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.052125199 · DOI
  49. 10.32614/cran.package.emt · DOI
  50. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01926 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkab1030 · DOI
  52. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002764 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Nakano, Mayumi , Kevin McCormick , Caghan Demirci , Feray Demirci , Sai Guna Ranjan Gurazada , Deepti Ramachandruni , Ayush Dusia , Joshua A. Rothhaupt , and Blake C. Meyers . 2020. “Next-Generation Sequence Databases: RNA and Genomic Informatics Resources for Plants.” Plant Physiology 182 (1): 136–46. · DOI
  54. Nei, Masatoshi , and Sudhir Kumar . 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/genetics/37.2.101 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.0812525106 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.36.12.719 · DOI
  58. 10.3390/plants10081712 · DOI
  59. 2014, “RAxML Version 8: A Tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies.” Bioinformatics (Oxford, England, 30, 1312
  60. 10.1093/MOLBEV/MSZ312 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/s41598-021-88917-x · DOI
  62. 10.1093/MOLBEV/MSAB120 · DOI
  63. 10.1186/s13059-014-0573-1 · DOI
  64. 10.1073/pnas.1907500116 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1973 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.04.027 · DOI
  67. 10.1101/gr.227462.117 · DOI
  68. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1230278 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.004 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s41467-022-32180-9 · DOI
  71. Waterhouse, Andrew M. , James B. Procter , David M. A. Martin , Michèle Clamp , and Geoffrey J. Barton . 2009. “Jalview Version 2--a Multiple Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Workbench.” Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25 (9): 1189–91. · DOI
  72. 10.1111/jse.12691 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/BF02866877 · DOI
  74. Woodhouse, Margaret R. , Ethalinda K. Cannon , John L. Portwood 2nd , Lisa C. Harper , Jack M. Gardiner , Mary L. Schaeffer , and Carson M. Andorf . 2021. “A Pan-Genomic Approach to Genome Databases Using Maize as a Model System.” BMC Plant Biology 21 (1): 385. · DOI
  75. 2023, “Two Teosintes Made Modern Maize.” Science (New York, N.Y, 382, 6674
  76. 10.1093/genetics/iyad146 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/s41467-024-52620-y · DOI
  78. 10.1073/pnas.1418918112 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.2402285121 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/pbi.13962 · DOI
  81. 10.1038/s41467-018-06139-8 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/nph.18167 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cryan, E., Phinney, G., Seetharam, A. S., Evans, M. M. S., Kellogg, E. A., Zhan, J., Meyers, B. C., Kliebenstein, D. J., & Ross-Ibarra, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Donald Danforth Plant Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cryan, Elli
Venue
Genetics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-12-03
Volume
230
Issue
3
ISSN
0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410143820
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2020754, 1906486, 1753632)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (CA-D-PLS-2066-H 548, CA‐D‐PLS‐2066‐H)
  • University of California, Davis
  • Economic Research Service (CA-D-PLS-2066-H 548)
  • Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
reproductive barriers, maize, teosinte, cross-incompatibility, pectin methylesterase, gene duplication, positive selection, diversifying selection, haplotype diversity, siRNA, gene silencing, domestication, Zea
MeSH terms
Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases, Zea mays, Haplotypes, Phylogeny, Plant Proteins, Pollen, Reproduction, Selection, Genetic, Genes, Plant, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review