PreprintCited by 10Glycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Atom-level Machine Learning of Protein-Glycan Interactions and Cross-chiral Recognition in Glycobiology

Open access
Carpenter, Eric J., Peng, Chuanhao, Wang, Sheng-Kai, Greiner, Russell, Derda, Ratmir·2025·Science Advances

Preprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.adx6373 · Paper page

Abstract

Cross-chiral recognition in glycobiology is the interactions between biologically conventional proteins and the enantiomers of biological glycans (e.g., L-proteins binding with L-hexoses) from organisms across all kingdoms of life. By symmetry, it also describes the interactions of chirally mirrored proteins with normal D-glycans. Knowledge of cross-chiral recognition is critical to understanding the potential interactions of existing life forms with artificial mirror-life forms, but currently known rules of protein-glycan interaction are insufficient. To build a methodology for learning such interactions, we used machine learned models that can predict binding strength between a set of proteins and glycans represented as graphs of atoms, rather than monosaccharides. Atomic q -gram and Morgan fingerprint (MF) based representation of glycans made it possible to train ML models that predict lectin binding properties of glycans, glycomimetic compounds, and enantiomers of all natural glycans. Critical to this training was merging disparate data—some with relative fluorescence units (RFU) from glycan microarrays and others with K d values from ITC—using a universal “fraction bound” parameter f at a specific lectin concentration. A fully-connected neural network architecture, MCNet takes a MF and concentration (C) as inputs and returns f for 147 lectins. Performance of MCNet is comparable to the GlyNet models, and by proxy to other state-of-the art models that predict strength of protein-glycan interactions. MCNet effectively predicts binding of glycomimetic compounds to Galectins 1, 3, and 7. Breaking from a monosaccharide-based description makes it possible for MCNet to predict cross-chiral recognition. We employed a Liquid Glycan Array to validate some predictions, such as the lack of interactions of L-mannose with D-mannose binding lectins, purified ConA, and DC-SIGN displayed on cells, and weak binding of L-Man to galactose-binding lectins and L-Glc binding by canonical fucose binding lectins. MCNet’s atom-level input makes it possible to agglomerate protein-glycan data from diverse glycans across all kingdoms of life and non-glycan structures (e.g. glycomimetic compounds). The universal fraction bound parameter makes it possible to unify disparate quantitative observations ( K d / IC 50 , RFU, chromatographic retention times, etc.). We believe that such an approach will facilitate a merger of knowledge from diverse glycobiology datasets and predict protein interactions with uncommon/unnatural glycans not attainable from current ML models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.01.21.633632

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Carpenter, E. J., Peng, C., Wang, S.-K., Greiner, R., & Derda, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Corresponding author
Derda, Ratmir
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-01-21
Volume
11
Issue
49
Pages
eadx6373-eadx6373
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417091407
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Genome Canada
  • Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (180445)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (rgpin-2019-04927, RGPIN-2016-402511, 402511)
  • National Research Council Canada (#RGPIN- 916 2016-402511)
  • Canadian Glycomics Network (CR-29 and TP−22, CR-29, TP-22)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
glycan-protein interactions, glycan-binding proteins, chiral recognition, glycan microarrays, fucose-binding lectin, binding affinity prediction, glycobiology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Polysaccharides, Protein Binding, Proteins, Lectins, Glycomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review