PreprintCited by 15Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residue conservation and solvent accessibility are (almost) all you need for predicting mutational effects in proteins

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf322 · Paper page

Abstract

Motivation: Predicting how mutations impact protein biophysical properties remains a significant challenge in computational biology. In recent years, numerous predictors, primarily deep learning models, have been developed to address this problem; however, issues such as their lack of interpretability and limited accuracy persist. Results: We showed that a simple evolutionary score, based on the log-odd ratio (LOR) of wild-type and mutated residue frequencies in evolutionary related proteins, when scaled by the residue’s relative solvent accessibility (RSA), performs on par with or slightly outperforms most of the benchmarked predictors, many of which are considerably more complex. The evaluation is performed on mutations from the ProteinGym deep mutational scanning dataset collection, which measures various properties such as stability, activity or fitness. This raises further questions about what these complex models actually learn and highlights their limitations in addressing prediction of mutational landscape. Availability: The RSALOR model is available as a user-friendly Python package that can be installed from the PyPI repository. The code is freely available at https://github.com/3BioCompBio/RSALOR . Contact: matsvei.tsishyn@ulb.be , fabrizio.pucci@ulb.be

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.02.03.636212

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1186/s13059-023-02986-x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102713 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.001 · DOI
  4. 10.15252/msb.202211474 · DOI
  5. Ruchir Rastogi , Ryan Chung , Sindy Li , Chang Li , Kyoungyeul Lee , Junwoo Woo , DongWook Kim , Changwon Keum , Giulia Babbi , Pier Luigi Martelli , et al. Critical assessment of missense variant effect predictors on disease-relevant variant data. bioRxiv, pages 2024– 06, 2024.
  6. Pascal Notin , Aaron Kollasch , Daniel Ritter , Lood Van Niekerk , Steffanie Paul , Han Spinner , Nathan Rollins , Ada Shaw , Rose Orenbuch , Ruben Weitzman , et al. ProteinGym: Large-scale benchmarks for protein fitness prediction and design. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. · DOI
  7. Pauline Hermans , Matsvei Tsishyn , Martin Schwersensky , Marianne Rooman , and Fabrizio Pucci . Exploring evolution to uncover insights into protein mutational stability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, page msae267, 2024. · DOI
  8. 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/bioin-formatics/bty348 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty340 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/bib/bbae491 · DOI
  14. Mingchen Li , Yang Tan , Xinzhu Ma , Bozitao Zhong , Huiqun Yu , Ziyi Zhou , Wanli Ouyang , Bingxin Zhou , Pan Tan , and Liang Hong . ProSST: Protein language modeling with quantized structure and disentangled attention. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024.
  15. 2023, Poet: A generative model of protein families as sequences-of-sequences, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 77379
  16. Jin Su , Chenchen Han , Yuyang Zhou , Junjie Shan , Xibin Zhou , and Fajie Yuan . SaProt: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary. bioRxiv, pages 2023–10, 2023. · DOI
  17. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae621 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pascal Notin , Lood Van Niekerk , Aaron W Kollasch , Daniel Ritter , Yarin Gal , and Debora S Marks . TranceptEVE: Combining family-specific and family-agnostic models of protein sequences for improved fitness prediction. bioRxiv, pages 2022–12, 2022. · DOI
  19. 10.1093/molbev/msz179 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/prot.24176 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41598-018-22531-2 · DOI
  24. Matt Sternke , Katherine W Tripp , and Doug Barrick . Protein stability is determined by single-site bias rather than pairwise covariance. bioRxiv, pages 2025–01, 2025. · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.aba3304 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Tsishyn, M., Hermans, P., Pucci, F., & Rooman, M.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Tsishyn, Matsvei
  • Pucci, Fabrizio
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-02-04
Volume
41
Issue
6
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410811941
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds de la recherche scientifique, FNRS, Belgium
  • Service Public de Wallonie, Belgium
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
protein mutations, amino acid conservation, solvent accessibility, deep mutational scanning, protein stability, protein activity, interpretability
MeSH terms
Mutation, Proteins, Software, Solvents, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review