Abundant positively-charged proteins underlie JCVI-Syn3A’s expanded nucleoid and ribosome distribution
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013898
Abstract
Nucleoid compaction in bacterial cells has been attributed to cytoplasmic crowding, supercoiling effects, and the action of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs). In most bacteria, including E. coli , these mechanisms condense the nucleoid to a smaller volume within the cell, excluding most ribosomes to the surrounding cytoplasm. In contrast, the nucleoid in many Mycoplasma s, including the Mycoplasma -derived synthetic cell JCVI-Syn3A, spans the entire cell, with ribosomes distributed throughout. Recent models of Syn3A representing only DNA and ribosomes (both charge neutral) instantiated the experimentally-observed expanded nucleoid and ribosome distribution. However, we found that this configuration becomes dynamically unstable, giving way to a compacted nucleoid that expels ribosomes to the periphery, suggesting the need for a more detailed model. Speculation emerging from recent studies of Syn3A suggests that its lower concentration of NAPs underlie its expanded nucleoid. We are interested in this genotype-to-’physiotype’-to-phenotype implication: that coupled transcription, translation, and nucleoid remodeling lead to different phenotypical outcomes. We developed a coarse-grained computational model of Syn3A, physically and explicitly representing ribosomes, cytoplasmic proteins, and a sequence-accurate chromosome with physiological distributions of size, charge, and relative molecular abundance. An interplay between Brownian dynamics, DNA stiffness (both inherent and NAP-enhanced), and electrostatic charge led naturally to a stable molecular distribution. We find that an interplay between inherent and induced DNA stiffness, heterogeneous mesh size, and crowding enhances nucleoid compaction and ribosome expulsion via a competition between entropic and enthalpic forces. In contrast, electrostatic interactions and size-polydispersity counteract these effects and expand the nucleoid. In particular, Syn3A’s atypically high abundance of positively-charged proteins shields ribosomes’ negative charge, allowing them to interpenetrate the nucleoid. Finally, we observe condensate formation arising from electrostatic interactions with potential implications on transcription and translation rates. Author summary: The chemical elements of DNA in cells — its genes — carry the instructions for it to grow, replicate, and divide but its physical organization keeps those instructions in order and easy to read. In bacterial cells, DNA occupies a specific region that determines where its mRNA transcripts are ultimately translated by ribosomes into the proteins that help the cell grow and adapt. This structure differs markedly between bacteria in two prominent genera: Escherichia and Mycoplasmas . Previous models and experiments explain why Escherichia ’s DNA tends to be compact and centralized, expelling ribosomes to the cell periphery, separating transcription from translation. But many Mycoplasmas , much simpler cells, have expanded DNA — and their ribosomes are co-located within the DNA’s structure. It’s been proposed that the same proteins that help cells adapt to stress may underlie this behavior, and they are far less abundant in Mycoplasmas , suggesting that expanded DNA may help improve low adaptability. To interrogate the interplay between mesoscale physical DNA architecture, stress proteins, and physical interactions in the cell, we built a computational model of the Mycoplasma -derived minimal cell JCVI-Syn3A, representing all of its DNA, ribosomes, and proteins with explicit physical resolution and interactions. By testing the conditions that drive these divergent “physiotypes”, we found an explanation in Syn3A’s atypically positively-charged proteins, which cloak ribosomes, letting them enter and expand the nucleoid.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Dynamics of chromosome organization in a minimal bacterial cell
Gilbert, B. R., Thornburg, Z. R., Brier, T. A., Stevens, J. A., Grünewald, F., Stone, J. E., Marrink, S. J., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1214962 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Roure, G., Sivasankar, V. S., & Zia, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zia, Roseanna N.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-08-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1013898-e1013898
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12858079
- OpenAlex
- W7125788679
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (g-2022-19561)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- nucleoid compaction, ribosome distribution, electrostatic interactions, charge shielding, nucleoid-associated proteins, coarse-grained models, DNA stiffness, cytoplasmic crowding, genome reduction, bacterial cell organization
- MeSH terms
- Bacterial Proteins, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Ribosomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review