PreprintCited by 7Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Versatile NTP recognition and domain fusions expand the functional repertoire of the ParB-CTPase fold beyond chromosome segregation

Open access
Kaljević, Jovana, Sukhoverkov, Kirill V., Johnson, Katie, Hocher, Antoine, Le, Tung B. K.·2025·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2527592122

Abstract

Nucleotide triphosphate (NTP)-dependent molecular switches regulate essential cellular processes by cycling between active and inactive states through nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. These mechanisms were long thought to rely exclusively on ATPase or GTPase proteins, until the discovery of CTPase activity in the bacterial chromosome segregation protein ParB. In the ParAB S system, CTP binding enables ParB accumulation around the centromere-like parS DNA sites to activate the ATPase ParA, thereby facilitating chromosome partitioning to daughter cells. CTP hydrolysis then releases ParB from DNA for recycling. This discovery uncovered a new regulatory principle, but the broader diversity of proteins employing a CTPase mechanism remains unclear. Here, we conduct a large-scale survey of proteins harboring the ParB-CTPase fold across bacteria, archaea, bacteriophages, and eukaryotes. While many ParB-like proteins follow the canonical ParAB S organization with ParA partners, we also identify numerous orphan homologs encoded outside of the parAB operon, frequently linked to mobile genetic elements that may have driven their rapid diversification. The ParB-CTPase folds in these divergent proteins are often fused to lineage-specific domains with diverse predicted biological activities. We further demonstrate that while many homologs retain CTP-binding, others instead bind ATP or GTP, revealing a broader spectrum of nucleotide specificities than previously appreciated. Our findings establish the ParB-CTPase fold as a widely distributed and evolutionarily versatile NTP-binding module, repeatedly co-opted through domain fusion and shifts in nucleotide specificity to enable functions far beyond the classical ParAB S -mediated DNA segregation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.10.10.680097

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 112

  1. 2016, GTP and ATP hydrolysis in biology, Biopolymers, 105, 419, 10.1002/bip.22867 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.09.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/348125a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.012 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.aay3965 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.015 · DOI
  7. 10.7554/eLife.53515 · DOI
  8. 10.15252/msb.20188516 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90402-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81135-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1098/rsob.200097 · DOI
  12. 2023, Connecting the dots: key insights on ParB for chromosome segregation from single-molecule studies, FEMS Microbiol. Rev, 48, fuad067
  13. 10.1128/JB.01239-07 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/2023.06.25.546419 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/sciadv.abn3299 · DOI
  16. 10.7554/eLife.69676 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1101/gad.242206.114 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102289 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05690.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81910-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/2025.03.14.642875 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07314.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2017.05.002 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1505147112 · DOI
  26. 2022, Relief of ParB autoinhibition by parS DNA catalysis and recycling of ParB by CTP hydrolysis promote bacterial centromere assembly, Sci Adv, 7, eabj2854
  27. 10.1038/nrmicro1342 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1421927112 · DOI
  29. 10.7554/eLife.28086 · DOI
  30. 2020, Diversification of DNA-Binding Specificity by Permissive and Specificity- Switching Mutations in the ParB/Noc Protein Family, Cell Reports, 32, 107928, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107928 · DOI
  31. 2017, A network of cis and trans interactions is required for ParB spreading, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, gkx271-
  32. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600530 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04133.x · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkx1192 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-017-02015-z · DOI
  36. 2025, KorB switching from DNA-sliding clamp to repressor mediates long-range gene silencing in a multi-drug resistance plasmid, Nat. Microbiol, 10, 448, 10.1038/s41564-024-01915-3 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.062 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90202-3 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07651.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.025 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/emboj.2009.144 · DOI
  42. 10.15252/embj.201490177 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/mbio.01519-23 · DOI
  44. Socea, J. N. , Bowman, G. R. & Wing, H. J . VirB, a Key Transcriptional Regulator of Virulence Plasmid Genes in Shigella flexneri, Forms DNA-Binding Site-Dependent Foci in the Bacterial Cytoplasm. J. Bacteriol. 203, (2021). · DOI
  45. 2023, VirB, a transcriptional activator of virulence in Shigella flexneri, uses CTP as a cofactor. Commun, Biol, 6, 1204
  46. 10.1128/JB.01813-06 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/mmi.13932 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41467-023-44509-z · DOI
  49. 2025, Orchestrated long-distance gene activation by a ParB-like BisD-CTP DNA clamp in low-frequency transfer competence development in Pseudomonas putida, Nucleic Acids Res, 53, gkaf802, 10.1093/nar/gkaf802 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/ncomms13446 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00064 · DOI
  52. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001875 · DOI
  53. 10.4161/cc.4.7.1786 · DOI
  54. 10.1074/jbc.M803244200 · DOI
  55. 2025, Archaea produce peptidoglycan hydrolases that kill bacteria, PLOS Biol, 23, e3003235, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003235 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.aaa9046 · DOI
  57. Bouet, J.-Y. & Funnell, B. E. Plasmid Localization and Partition in Enterobacteriaceae. Ecosal Plus 8, (2019). · DOI
  58. 2020, Rules and Exceptions: The Role of Chromosomal ParB in DNA Segregation and Other Cellular Processes, Microorg, 8, 105, 10.3390/microorganisms8010105 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1415 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/emboj.2012.128 · DOI
  61. 10.1073/pnas.92.6.1896 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.173 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/nar/30.7.1670 · DOI
  64. 10.1128/JB.05283-11 · DOI
  65. 2025, Redefining DNA cleavage in type I CRISPR systems with the HNH domain, MedComm, 6, e70060, 10.1002/mco2.70060 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkad879 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/s41586-023-06376-y · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkt573 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/mmi.13414 · DOI
  70. 2025, Anti-restriction functions of injected phage proteins revealed by peeling back layers of bacterial immunity, Nat. Commun, 16, 7828, 10.1038/s41467-025-63056-3 · DOI
  71. 2025, Unveiling the multifaceted domain polymorphism of the Menshen antiphage system, Nucleic Acids Res, 53, gkaf357, 10.1093/nar/gkaf357 · DOI
  72. 10.1111/mmi.15047 · DOI
  73. 2024, Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island 2 encodes two distinct types of restriction systems, J. Bacteriol, 206, e00145
  74. 10.1172/JCI200419874 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.abb.2013.10.008 · DOI
  76. 10.1152/ajpcell.00282.2005 · DOI
  77. 10.1021/cb200231c · DOI
  78. 2005, The ASCH superfamily: novel domains with a fold related to the PUA domain and a potential role in RNA metabolism, Bioinformatics, 22, 257
  79. 10.1093/nar/gkz1053 · DOI
  80. 2022, Structural insights into molecular mechanism for N6-adenosine methylation by MT-A70 family methyltransferase METTL4, Nat. Commun, 13, 5636, 10.1038/s41467-022-33277-x · DOI
  81. 2021, Diversity of the reaction mechanisms of SAM-dependent enzymes, Acta Pharm. Sin. B, 11, 632, 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.011 · DOI
  82. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01139 · DOI
  83. 10.1038/srep12368 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/s41467-019-09390-9 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.39 · DOI
  86. 10.1007/s13238-010-0009-y · DOI
  87. 10.1128/mmbr.00090-19 · DOI
  88. 2024, Bacterial protein acetylation: mechanisms, functions, and methods for study, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol, 14, 1408947, 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1408947 · DOI
  89. 10.1111/mmi.12088 · DOI
  90. 2020, A Distinct Motif in a Prokaryotic Small Ras-Like GTPase Highlights Unifying Features of Walker B Motifs in P-Loop NTPases, J. Mol. Biol, 432, 5544, 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.07.024 · DOI
  91. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.856547 · DOI
  92. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5378 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 2020, On the emergence of P-Loop NTPase and Rossmann enzymes from a Beta- Alpha-Beta ancestral fragment, eLife, 9, e64415, 10.7554/eLife.64415 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166788 · DOI
  95. 1993, Conformational Switch of Ras Proteins, Mol. Cells, 3, 229, 10.1016/S1016-8478(23)17154-8 · DOI
  96. 10.1074/jbc.M102186200 · DOI
  97. 10.7554/eLife.02758 · DOI
  98. 10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6 · DOI
  99. 10.1038/nsmb836 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100705 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.006 · DOI
  102. 10.1073/pnas.2105447118 · DOI
  103. 10.1186/s12964-023-01263-5 · DOI
  104. 2023, The many roles of cyclic di-AMP to control the physiology of Bacillus subtilis, microLife, 4, uqad043, 10.1093/femsml/uqad043 · DOI
  105. 2021, NAD+ pool depletion as a signal for the Rex regulon involved in Streptococcus agalactiae virulence, PLoS Pathog, 17, e1009791, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009791 · DOI
  106. 2023, Structural and functional diversity of bacterial cyclic nucleotide perception by CRP proteins, microLife, 4, uqad024, 10.1093/femsml/uqad024 · DOI
  107. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1002/jcc.21256 · DOI
  109. 10.1021/ct200133y · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1089/phage.2021.0007 · DOI
  112. 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kaljević, J., Sukhoverkov, K. V., Johnson, K., Hocher, A., & Le, T. B. K.
Affiliations
  • John Innes Centre (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kaljević, Jovana
  • Sukhoverkov, Kirill V.
  • Hocher, Antoine
  • Le, Tung B. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-10-10
Volume
122
Issue
49
Pages
e2527592122-e2527592122
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417002201
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (221776/Z/2/Z, 227755/Z/23/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
chromosome segregation, domain fusion, nucleotide specificity, ATP binding, GTP binding, mobile genetic elements, protein evolution, bacterial chromosome partitioning, archaea, bacteriophages
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Bacterial Proteins, Cytidine Triphosphate, Nucleotides, Chromosome Segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review