The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
scDock: Streamlining drug discovery targeting cell-cell communication via scRNA-seq analysis and molecular docking
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btag103 · Paper page
Abstract
Summary: Identifying drugs that target intercellular communication networks represents a promising therapeutic strategy, yet linking single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis to structure-based drug screening remains technically challenging and requires substantial bioinformatics expertise. We present scDock, an integrated and user-friendly pipeline that seamlessly connects scRNA-seq data processing, cell–cell communication inference, and molecular docking-based drug discovery. Through a single configuration file, users can execute the complete workflow, from raw scRNA-seq data to ranked drug candidates, without programming skills. scDock automates the identification of disease-relevant ligand–receptor interactions from scRNA-seq data and perfoms structure-based virtual screening against these communication targets using Protein Data Bank (PDB) or AlphaFold-predicted protein structures. The pipeline generates comprehensive outputs at each stage, enabling users to explore intercellular signaling alterations and discover therapeutic compounds targeting specific cell–cell communications. scDock addresses a critical gap by providing an accessible end-to-end solution for communication-targeted drug discovery from single-cell data. Availability and Implementation: scDock is freely available at https://github.com/Andrewneteye4343/scDock . It is implemented in R, Python, shell scripts, and supports Linux systems, including Ubuntu and Debian.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures

Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1038/nmeth.4463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.4314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0591-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1132 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.4096 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aam8940 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/S41587-023-01767-Y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0113-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41596-024-01045-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkae1059 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Single-cell transcriptomics reveals a mechanosensitive injury signaling pathway in early diabetic nephropathy, Genome Med, 15, 2, 10.1186/s13073-022-01145-4 · DOI
- 2020, Recent advances in the development of protein-protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials, Signal Transduct Target Ther, 5, 213, 10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.21334 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Single-cell Mayo Map (scMayoMap): an easy-to-use tool for cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis, BMC Biol, 21, 223, 10.1186/s12915-023-01728-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac235 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, C.-H., Oyang, Y.-J., Huang, H.-C., & Juan, H.-F.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Hsuan-Cheng
- Juan, Hsueh-Fen
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-11-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12996892
- OpenAlex
- W7133224016
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Council (NSTC112-2221-EA49-061-MY3, NSTC114-2221-EA49-144-MY3, 114-2321-B-002-022, NSTC 112-2221-E-A49-061-MY3)
- National Taiwan University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- intercellular communication, drug discovery, ligand-receptor interactions, structure-based virtual screening, molecular docking, single-cell RNA sequencing, AlphaFold protein structure, drug target prioritization, bioinformatics pipeline
- MeSH terms
- RNA-Seq, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Cell Communication, Humans, Ligands, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review