PreprintCited by 77Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atomic Resolution Mechanism of Ligand Binding to a Solvent Inaccessible Cavity in T4 Lysozyme

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006180

Abstract

Ligand binding sites in proteins are often localized to deeply buried cavities, inaccessible to bulk solvent. Yet, in many cases binding of cognate ligands occurs rapidly. An intriguing system is presented by the L99A cavity mutant of T4 Lysozyme (L99A T4L) that rapidly binds benzene (~10 6 M −1 s −1 ). Although the protein has long served as a model system for protein thermodynamics and crystal structures of both free and benzene-bound L99A T4L are available, the kinetic pathways by which benzene reaches its solvent-inaccessible binding cavity remain elusive. The current work, using extensive molecular dynamics simulation, achieves this by capturing the complete process of spontaneous recognition of benzene by L99A T4L at atomistic resolution. A series of multi-microsecond unbiased molecular dynamics simulation trajectories unequivocally reveal how benzene, starting in bulk solvent, diffuses to the protein and spontaneously reaches the solvent inaccessible cavity of L99A T4L. The simulated and high-resolution X-ray derived bound structures are in excellent agreement. A robust four-state Markov model, developed using cumulative 60 µs trajectories, identifies and quantifies multiple ligand binding pathways with low activation barriers. Interestingly, none of these identified binding pathways required large conformational changes for ligand access to the buried cavity. Rather, these involve transient but crucial opening of a channel to the cavity via subtle displacements in the positions of key helices (helix4/helix6, helix7/helix9) leading to rapid binding. Free energy simulations further elucidate that these channel-opening events would have been unfavorable in otherwise ligand-inactive wild type T4L. Taken together, by integrating experiments, these simulations provide unprecedented mechanistic insights into complete ligand recognition process in a buried cavity. By illustrating the power of subtle helix movements in opening up multiple pathways for ligand access, this work offers an alternate view of ligand recognition mechanism in a solvent-inaccessible cavity, contrary to common perception of single dominant pathway for ligand binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/259549

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.06.176 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF03256679 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.02.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.086 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/355371a0 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1553543 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/bi00027a006 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nsb0696-516 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1305688110 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10858-008-9251-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature10349 · DOI
  12. 10.1039/C5SC03886 C · DOI
  13. 10.1021/bi001351t · DOI
  14. 2016, Detecting O2 binding sites in protein cavities, The Author(s), 6, 20534
  15. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4063 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/jp807701h · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1021/ja202726y · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1104614108 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1103547108 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2015, Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models, The Author(s), 6, 7653
  22. 10.1007/978-94-007-7606-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.230602 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1021/ct500040 r · DOI
  26. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102314 · DOI
  28. Chandler D. Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
  29. 10.1021/ja054842f · DOI
  30. 10.1021/ja00381a009 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1021/bi00449a003 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/cr030413t · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.1187409 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1021/ct300400x · DOI
  35. 10.7554/eLife.17505 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.041 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.01.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0508224102 · DOI
  39. 10.1039/C7SC01627A · DOI
  40. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1215733109 · DOI
  42. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125920 · DOI
  43. 1989, Control of enzyme activity by an engineered disulfide bond, Science (80-), 243, 792LP, 10.1126/science.2916125 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/i460004a016 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI
  46. 10.1002/jcc.24030 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/00268978400101201 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 · DOI
  49. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  50. 2013, A flexible algorithm for calculating pair interactions on {SIMD} architectures, Comput Phys Comm.s, 184, 2641, 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.06.003 · DOI
  51. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  53. 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
  54. 10.1063/1.2714539 · DOI
  55. 10.1063/1.2714538 · DOI
  56. 2005, Coarse Master Equation from Bayesian Analysis of Replica Molecular Dynamics Simulations, J Phys Chem B, 109, 6479, 10.1021/jp046448u · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.1201810109 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743 · DOI
  59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3634 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1063/1.4811489 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1021/ct300878a · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1063/1.4828816 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 1977, Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling, J Comput Phys, 23, 187, 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 1992, THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules, {I.} The method. J Comput Chem, 13, 1011, 10.1002/jcc.540130812 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 2014, {PLUMED} 2: New feathers for an old bird, Comput Phys Comm.s, 185, 604, 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/s10858-009-9310-6 · DOI
  68. 1990, A novel approach for sequential assignment of 1 H, 13 C, and 15 N spectra of proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, Application to calmodulin. Biochemistry, 29, 4659
  69. Cavanagh J , Fairbrother WJ , Palmer AG , Rance M , Skelton NJ. Protein NMR Spectroscopy, Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2006.
  70. 10.1038/nature10349 · DOI
  71. 1995, NMRPipe – a Multidimensional Spectral Processing System Based on Unix Pipes, JBiomol NMR, 6, 277
  72. 10.1007/s10858-009-9333-z · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mondal, J., Ahalawat, N., Pandit, S., Kay, L. E., & Vallurupalli, P.
Affiliations
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Mondal, Jagannath
  • Vallurupalli, Pramodh
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-02-04
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
e1006180-e1006180
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951427626
Cited by
77
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (ECR/2016/001088)
  • Division of Chemistry
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
T4 lysozyme, ligand binding mechanism, cavity opening, binding pathway, Markov state models, free energy simulation, protein-ligand recognition
MeSH terms
Benzene, Binding Sites, Ligands, Muramidase, Protein Binding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review