PreprintCited by 13Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

csuWGCNA: a combination of signed and unsigned WGCNA to capture negative correlations

Open access
Dai, Rujia, Xia, Yan, Liu, Chunyu, Chen, Chao·2018·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Network analysis helps us to understand how genes jointly affect biological functions. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) is a frequently used method to build gene co-expression networks. WGCNA may be calculated with signed or unsigned correlations, with both methods having strengths and weaknesses, but both methods fail to capture weak and moderate negative correlations, which may be important in gene regulation. Combining the advantages and removing the disadvantages of both methods in one analysis would be desirable. In this study, we present a combination of signed and unsigned WGCNA (csuWGCNA), which combines the signed and unsigned methods and improves the detection of negative correlations. We applied csuWGCNA in 14 simulated datasets, six ground truth datasets and two large human brain datasets. Multiple metrics were used to evaluate csuWGCNA at gene pair and gene module levels. We found that csuWGCNA provides robust module detection and captures more negative correlations than the other methods, and is especially useful for non-coding RNA such as microRNA (miRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). csuWGCNA enables detection of more informative modules with biological functions than signed or unsigned WGCNA, which enables discovery of novel gene regulation and helps interpretations in systems biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/288225

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 13

Authors
Dai, R., Xia, Y., Liu, C., & Chen, C.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Chunyu
  • Chen, Chao
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-03-24
OpenAlex
W2789241511
Cited by
13
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81401114, 2016YFC1306000, 31571312, 81401114, 31571312)
  • Central South University (2018CX033, 2015CXS034)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (2018CX033, 2015CXS034)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES024988)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene co-expression network, negative correlation, gene modules, module detection, gene expression regulation, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, non-coding RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review