PreprintCited by 31Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Gene-Based Analysis in HRC Imputed Genome Wide Association Data Identifies Three Novel Genes For Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Baker, Emily, Sims, Rebecca, Leonenko, Ganna, Frizzati, Aura, Harwood, Janet, Grozeva, Detelina, GERAD/PERADES, IGAP consortia +28 more·2018·PLoS ONE

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pone.0218111

Abstract

A novel POLARIS gene-based analysis approach was employed to compute gene-based polygenic risk score (PRS) for all individuals in the latest HRC imputed GERAD (N cases=3,332 and N controls=9,832) data using the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project summary statistics (N cases=13,676 and N controls=27,322, excluding GERAD subjects) to identify the SNPs and weight their risk alleles for the PRS score. SNPs were assigned to known, protein coding genes using GENCODE (v19). SNPs are assigned using both 1) no window around the gene and 2) a window of 35kb upstream and 10kb downstream to include transcriptional regulatory elements. The overall association of a gene is determined using a logistic regression model, adjusting for population covariates. Three novel gene-wide significant genes were determined from the POLARIS gene-based analysis using a gene window; PPARGC1A, RORA and ZNF423 . The ZNF423 gene resides in an Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-specific protein network which also includes other AD-related genes. The PPARGC1A gene has been linked to energy metabolism and the generation of amyloid beta plaques and the RORA has strong links with genes which are differentially expressed in the hippocampus. We also demonstrate no enrichment for genes in either loss of function intolerant or conserved noncoding sequence regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/374876

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several genome-wide significant loci not previously detected at the SNP level have been identified using gene-based approaches, including those assigned to TP53INP and PPARGC1A.

    “Several genome-wide significant loci not previously detected at the SNP level have been identified using gene-based approaches, including those assigned to TP53INP [115] and PPARGC1A [116].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [116]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, E., Sims, R., Leonenko, G., Frizzati, A., Harwood, J., Grozeva, D., GERAD/PERADES, consortia, I., Morgan, K., Passmore, P., Holmes, C., Powell, J., Brayne, C., Gill, M., Mead, S., Heun, R., Bossù, P., Spalletta, G., Goate, A., Cruchaga, C., van Duijn, C., Maier, W., Ramirez, A., Jones, L., Hardy, J., Ivanov, D., Hill, M., Holmans, P., Allen, N., Morgan, P., Williams, J., Escott-Price, V., GERAD Consortium, ADGC Consortium, CHARGE Consortium, & EADI Consortium
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Williams, Julie
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-07-23
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
e0218111-e0218111
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2958689915
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Miami
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Northwestern University
  • School of Medicine, Boston University
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Rush University
  • Wellcome Trust (MR/L010305/1)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0616-10090, NF-SI-0617-10175, NF-SI-0611-10084)
  • Parkinson's UK (G-1307)
  • Rosetrees Trust
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0009)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute
  • Dementias Platform UK (MR/L023784/2, MR/L010305/1)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
  • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L023784/2, MR/K01417X/1, MR/L501517/1, MR/L501542/1, MR/J004758/1, UKDRIdata023, MR/L010305/1, MC_PC_17112, MR/K013041/1, MR/M009076/1, MR/L023784/1)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129, U01AG049505, U01AG052409, R01AG054076, U01AG032984, U24AG056270, U24AG021886)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017950)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
late-onset Alzheimer's disease, genetic susceptibility loci, gene-based association analysis, PGC-1α, RORA, ZNF423, circadian rhythm, energy metabolism, amyloid plaques, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genotype imputation
MeSH terms
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha, Alzheimer Disease, Cholesterol, Circadian Rhythm, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Proteins, Genome, Human, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Centrosome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review