The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Menstrual Health Status and Evolution through Mobile Apps for Fertility Awareness
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41746-019-0139-4
Abstract
For most women of reproductive age, assessing menstrual health and fertility typically involves regular visits to a gynecologist or another clinician. While these evaluations provide critical information on an individual’s reproductive health status, they typically rely on memory-based self-reports, and the results are rarely, if ever, assessed at the population level. In recent years, mobile apps for menstrual tracking have become very popular, allowing us to evaluate the reliability and tracking frequency of millions of self-observations, thereby providing an unparalleled view, both in detail and scale, on menstrual health and its evolution for large populations. In particular, we were interested in exploring the tracking behavior of the app users and their overall observation patterns in an effort to understand if they were consistent with previous small-scale medical studies. We also investigated whether their precision allowed the detection and estimation of ovulation timing, which is critical for reproductive and menstrual health. Retrospective self-observation data were acquired from two mobile apps dedicated to the application of the sympto-thermal fertility awareness method, resulting in a dataset of more than 30 million days of observations from over 2.7 million cycles. The analysis of the data showed that up to 40% of the cycles in which users were seeking pregnancy had recordings every single day. With a modeling approach using Hidden Markov Models to describe the collected data and estimate ovulation timing, it was found that follicular phases average duration and range were larger than previously reported, with only 24% of ovulations occurring at days 14 to 15, while the luteal phase duration and range were in line with previous reports, although short luteal phases (10 days or less) were more frequently observed (in up to 20% of cycles). The digital epidemiology approach presented here can help to lead to a better understanding of menstrual health and its connection to women’s health overall, which has historically been severely understudied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fertility awareness apps and the associated databases of fertility data provide a unique opportunity to examine a large number of menstrual cycles in order to improve understanding.
“Besides the potential benefits to the individual, fertility awareness apps and the associated databases of fertility data provide a unique opportunity to examine a large number of menstrual cycles in order to improve understanding.25,26”
From Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app
Berglund Scherwitzl, E., Lundberg, O., Kopp Kallner, H., Gemzell Danielsson, K., Trussell, J., & Scherwitzl, R. (2017) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014 · Cited by 101
Modeling Individual Cyclic Variation in Human Behavior
Pierson, E., Althoff, T., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186052 · Cited by 41
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1023/A:1006595703472 · DOI
- 2018, Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness–Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention, Obstet. Gynecol, 00, 1
- 1976, Cervical Mucus and Basal Body Temperature Method of Regulating Births. Field Trial, Lancet, 308, 282, 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)90732-7 · DOI
- 1966, Cyclic changes of cervical mucus in normal and progestin-treated women, Fertil. Steril, 17, 663, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)36068-X · DOI
- 1972, Symptoms and Hormonal Changes Accompanying Ovulation, Lancet, 299, 282, 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90291-7 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09513590500097507 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deh173 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dem003 · DOI
- 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.160022 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Evaluation of Smartphone Menstrual Cycle Tracking Applications Using an Adapted APPLICATIONS Scoring System, Obstet. Gynecol, 127, 1153, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001444 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, A Review of Smartphone Applications Designed for Tracking Women’s Reproductive Health, Obstet. Gynecol, 125, 2015
- 2018, Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception, Front. Public Heal, 6, 1
- 2016, Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception, Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care, 21, 234, 10.3109/13625187.2016.1154143 · DOI
- 2015, Identification and prediction of the fertile window using NaturalCycles, Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care, 20, 403, 10.3109/13625187.2014.988210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/emph/eoy018/5048464 · DOI
- Liu, B. et al. Predicting pregnancy using large-scale data from a women’s health tracking mobile application. ArXiv (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Expert in fertility appreciation: The Creighton Model practitioner, J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs, 30, 386, 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01557.x · DOI
- 1982, Relation between the luteinizing hormone peak, the nadir of the basal body temperature and the cervical mucus score, BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 89, 985, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04651.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s12019-001-0010-8 · DOI
- 10.1079/PHN2001322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)42257-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04830.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04831.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)42257-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00051.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1987, Endometrial morphology and peripheral hormone levels in women with regular menstrual cycles**Supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) Special Programme of Research in Human Reproduction and by Swiss National Research Foundation grant 3.912-0.82.††, Fertil. Steril, 48, 401, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59406-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.073 · DOI · Paper page
- Harlow, S. D. & Ephross, S. A . Epidemiology of Menstruation and Its Relevance to Women’s Health. Public Health 17, (1995). · DOI
- 2016, Sex hormone effects on autonomic mechanisms of thermoregulation in humans, Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin, 196, 75, 10.1016/j.autneu.2015.11.004 · DOI
- 2017, Prospective evaluation of luteal phase length and natural fertility, Fertil. Steril, 107, 749, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.022 · DOI
- American Academy Of Pediatrics and American College of Obstretricians and Gynecologists. Menstruation in Girls and Adolescents: Using the Menstrual Cycle as a Vital Sign, 2016, Am. Acad. Pediatr, 137, e20154480
- Alvergne, A. & Högqvist Tabor, V . Is female health cyclical? Evolutionary perspectives on menstruation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, In Press (2018). · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002592 · DOI
- 2017, Women’s health, Nature, 550, S1, 10.1038/550S1a · DOI
- 2010, Menstrual cycle-related exacerbation of disease, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 202, 221, 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.061 · DOI
- 1989, A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition, Proc. IEEE, 77, 257, 10.1109/5.18626 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles
Bull, J. R., Rowland, S. P., Scherwitzl, E. B., Scherwitzl, R., Danielsson, K. G., & Harper, J. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0152-7 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Symul, L., Wac, K., Hillard, P., & Salathé, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Symul, Laura
- Venue
- npj Digital Medicine
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-08-15
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-64
- ISSN
- 2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6635432
- OpenAlex
- W2956186668
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (178315)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- menstrual health, fertility awareness, menstrual tracking apps, ovulation timing, follicular phase, luteal phase, self-observation, digital epidemiology, hidden Markov models, menstrual cycle length, women's reproductive health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review