PreprintCited by 80Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMenstrual Health and DisordersReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Menstrual Health Status and Evolution through Mobile Apps for Fertility Awareness

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41746-019-0139-4

Abstract

For most women of reproductive age, assessing menstrual health and fertility typically involves regular visits to a gynecologist or another clinician. While these evaluations provide critical information on an individual’s reproductive health status, they typically rely on memory-based self-reports, and the results are rarely, if ever, assessed at the population level. In recent years, mobile apps for menstrual tracking have become very popular, allowing us to evaluate the reliability and tracking frequency of millions of self-observations, thereby providing an unparalleled view, both in detail and scale, on menstrual health and its evolution for large populations. In particular, we were interested in exploring the tracking behavior of the app users and their overall observation patterns in an effort to understand if they were consistent with previous small-scale medical studies. We also investigated whether their precision allowed the detection and estimation of ovulation timing, which is critical for reproductive and menstrual health. Retrospective self-observation data were acquired from two mobile apps dedicated to the application of the sympto-thermal fertility awareness method, resulting in a dataset of more than 30 million days of observations from over 2.7 million cycles. The analysis of the data showed that up to 40% of the cycles in which users were seeking pregnancy had recordings every single day. With a modeling approach using Hidden Markov Models to describe the collected data and estimate ovulation timing, it was found that follicular phases average duration and range were larger than previously reported, with only 24% of ovulations occurring at days 14 to 15, while the luteal phase duration and range were in line with previous reports, although short luteal phases (10 days or less) were more frequently observed (in up to 20% of cycles). The digital epidemiology approach presented here can help to lead to a better understanding of menstrual health and its connection to women’s health overall, which has historically been severely understudied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/385054

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fertility awareness apps and the associated databases of fertility data provide a unique opportunity to examine a large number of menstrual cycles in order to improve understanding.

    “Besides the potential benefits to the individual, fertility awareness apps and the associated databases of fertility data provide a unique opportunity to examine a large number of menstrual cycles in order to improve understanding.25,26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1023/A:1006595703472 · DOI
  2. 2018, Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness–Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention, Obstet. Gynecol, 00, 1
  3. 1976, Cervical Mucus and Basal Body Temperature Method of Regulating Births. Field Trial, Lancet, 308, 282, 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)90732-7 · DOI
  4. 1966, Cyclic changes of cervical mucus in normal and progestin-treated women, Fertil. Steril, 17, 663, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)36068-X · DOI
  5. 1972, Symptoms and Hormonal Changes Accompanying Ovulation, Lancet, 299, 282, 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90291-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/09513590500097507 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/humrep/deh173 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/humrep/dem003 · DOI
  10. 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.160022 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2016, Evaluation of Smartphone Menstrual Cycle Tracking Applications Using an Adapted APPLICATIONS Scoring System, Obstet. Gynecol, 127, 1153, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001444 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2015, A Review of Smartphone Applications Designed for Tracking Women’s Reproductive Health, Obstet. Gynecol, 125, 2015
  13. 2018, Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception, Front. Public Heal, 6, 1
  14. 2016, Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception, Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care, 21, 234, 10.3109/13625187.2016.1154143 · DOI
  15. 2015, Identification and prediction of the fertile window using NaturalCycles, Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care, 20, 403, 10.3109/13625187.2014.988210 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/emph/eoy018/5048464 · DOI
  17. Liu, B. et al. Predicting pregnancy using large-scale data from a women’s health tracking mobile application. ArXiv (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2001, Expert in fertility appreciation: The Creighton Model practitioner, J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs, 30, 386, 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01557.x · DOI
  19. 1982, Relation between the luteinizing hormone peak, the nadir of the basal body temperature and the cervical mucus score, BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 89, 985, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04651.x · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s12019-001-0010-8 · DOI
  21. 10.1079/PHN2001322 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)42257-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04830.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04831.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)42257-0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00051.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 1987, Endometrial morphology and peripheral hormone levels in women with regular menstrual cycles**Supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) Special Programme of Research in Human Reproduction and by Swiss National Research Foundation grant 3.912-0.82.††, Fertil. Steril, 48, 401, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59406-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.073 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Harlow, S. D. & Ephross, S. A . Epidemiology of Menstruation and Its Relevance to Women’s Health. Public Health 17, (1995). · DOI
  30. 2016, Sex hormone effects on autonomic mechanisms of thermoregulation in humans, Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin, 196, 75, 10.1016/j.autneu.2015.11.004 · DOI
  31. 2017, Prospective evaluation of luteal phase length and natural fertility, Fertil. Steril, 107, 749, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.022 · DOI
  32. American Academy Of Pediatrics and American College of Obstretricians and Gynecologists. Menstruation in Girls and Adolescents: Using the Menstrual Cycle as a Vital Sign, 2016, Am. Acad. Pediatr, 137, e20154480
  33. Alvergne, A. & Högqvist Tabor, V . Is female health cyclical? Evolutionary perspectives on menstruation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, In Press (2018). · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002592 · DOI
  35. 2017, Women’s health, Nature, 550, S1, 10.1038/550S1a · DOI
  36. 2010, Menstrual cycle-related exacerbation of disease, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 202, 221, 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.061 · DOI
  37. 1989, A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition, Proc. IEEE, 77, 257, 10.1109/5.18626 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Symul, L., Wac, K., Hillard, P., & Salathé, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Symul, Laura
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
64-64
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2956186668
Cited by
80
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (178315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
menstrual health, fertility awareness, menstrual tracking apps, ovulation timing, follicular phase, luteal phase, self-observation, digital epidemiology, hidden Markov models, menstrual cycle length, women's reproductive health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review