Predicting mRNA abundance directly from genomic sequence using deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107663 · Paper page
Abstract
SUMMARY: Algorithms that accurately predict gene structure from primary sequence alone were transformative for annotating the human genome. Can we also predict the expression levels of genes based solely on genome sequence? Here we sought to apply deep convolutional neural networks towards this goal. Surprisingly, a model that includes only promoter sequences and features associated with mRNA stability explains 59% and 71% of variation in steady-state mRNA levels in human and mouse, respectively. This model, which we call Xpresso, more than doubles the accuracy of alternative sequence-based models, and isolates rules as predictive as models relying on ChIP-seq data. Xpresso recapitulates genome-wide patterns of transcriptional activity and predicts the influence of enhancers, heterochromatic domains, and microRNAs. Model interpretation reveals that promoter-proximal CpG dinucleotides strongly predict transcriptional activity. Looking forward, we propose the accurate prediction of cell type-specific gene expression based solely on primary sequence as a grand challenge for the field.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 72 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Agarwal, V., & Shendure, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Vikram
- Shendure, Jay
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-09-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 107663-107663
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026475692
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007093)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006768, DP1HG007811, R01HG009136, UM1HG009408)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA197139)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- promoter, mRNA stability, deep convolutional neural networks, CpG, enhancers, heterochromatin, microRNA, transcriptional activity, human and mouse genomes, cell type-specific gene expression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Nerve Net, RNA, Messenger, Genomics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review