PreprintCited by 10Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Population-scale proteome variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells

Open access
Mirauta, Bogdan A, Seaton, Daniel D, Bensaddek, Dalila, Brenes, Alejandro, Bonder, Marc J, Kilpinen, Helena, HipSci Consortium, Stegle, Oliver +1 more·2018·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.57390

Abstract

Realising the potential of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology for drug discovery, disease modelling and cell therapy requires an understanding of variability across iPSC lines. While previous studies have characterized iPS cell lines genetically and transcriptionally, little is known about the variability of the iPSC proteome. Here, we present the first comprehensive proteomic iPSC dataset, analysing 202 iPSC lines derived from 151 donors. We characterise the major genetic determinants affecting proteome and transcriptome variation across iPSC lines and identify key regulatory mechanisms affecting variation in protein abundance. Our data identified >700 human iPSC protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs). We mapped trans regulatory effects, identifying an important role for protein-protein interactions. We discovered that pQTLs show increased enrichment in disease-linked GWAS variants, compared with RNA-based eQTLs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/439216

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 10

Authors
Mirauta, B. A., Seaton, D. D., Bensaddek, D., Brenes, A., Bonder, M. J., Kilpinen, H., HipSci Consortium, Stegle, O., & Lamond, A. I.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-10-11
OpenAlex
W2897544150
Cited by
10
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT098503)
  • Medical Research Council (WT098503)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
human induced pluripotent stem cells, protein quantitative trait loci, protein-protein interaction, transcriptome variation, GWAS variants, disease modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review