The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilayered N-glycoproteomics reveals impaired N-glycosylation promoting Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03555
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases that currently lacks clear pathogenesis and effective treatment. Protein glycosylation is ubiquitous in brain tissue and site-specific analysis of N-glycoproteome, which is technically challenging, can advance our understanding of the glycoproteins’ role in AD. In this study, we profiled the multilayered variations in proteins, N-glycosites, N-glycans, and in particular site-specific N-glycopeptides in the APP/PS1 and wild type mouse brain through combining pGlyco 2.0 strategy with other quantitative N-glycoproteomic strategies. The comprehensive brain N-glycoproteome landscape was constructed, and rich details of the heterogeneous site-specific protein N-glycosylations were exhibited. Quantitative analyses explored generally downregulated N-glycosylation involving proteins such as glutamate receptors, as well as fucosylated and oligo-mannose type glycans in APP/PS1 mice versus wild type mice. Moreover, our preliminary functional study revealed that N-glycosylation was crucial for the membrane localization of NCAM1 and for maintaining the excitability and viability of neuron cells. Our work offered a panoramic view of the N-glycoproteomes in Alzheimer’s disease and revealed that generally impaired N-glycosylation promotes Alzheimer’s disease progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“Quantification of site-specific glycopeptides were based on the peak areas as previously described (Schwanhausser et al, 2011).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002466 · DOI
- 10.1089/rej.2009.0992 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-04-01454.1988 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, In-depth mapping of the mouse brain N-glycoproteome reveals widespread N-glycosylation of diverse brain proteins, Oncotarget, 7, 38796, 10.18632/oncotarget.9737 · DOI
- 2017, Firmiana: towards a one-stop proteomic cloud platform for data processing and analysis, NAT BIOTECHNOL, 35, 409, 10.1038/nbt.3825 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00640.x · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1601576 · DOI
- 2016, Glycoblotting method allows for rapid and efficient glycome profiling of human Alzheimer’s disease brain, serum and cerebrospinal fluid towards potential biomarker discovery, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1860, 1716, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.03.009 · DOI
- 2015, Alzheimer’s disease: a report from the 7th Kuopio Alzheimer symposium, Neurodegener Dis Manag, 5, 379, 10.2217/nmt.15.31 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/emmm.201404438 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, N-glycan and Alzheimer’s disease, Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 1861, 2447, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.04.012 · DOI
- 2017, pGlyco 2.0 enables precision N-glycoproteomics with comprehensive quality control and one-step mass spectrometry for intact glycopeptide identification, NAT COMMUN, 8, 438, 10.1038/s41467-017-00535-2 · DOI
- Mehrabian M , Hildebrandt H , Schmitt-Ulms G (2016) NCAM1 Polysialylation: The Prion Protein’s Elusive Reason for Being? ASN NEURO 8. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01444-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, CSF N-glycoproteomics for early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease, J PROTEOMICS, 131, 29, 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Mass Spectrometry Approaches to Glycomic and Glycoproteomic Analyses, CHEM REV, 118, 7886, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00732 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.721600.x · DOI
- 10.1385/MN:24:1-3:107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/febs.12590 · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.12590 · DOI
- 10.15252/emmm.201606210 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Comparative glycoproteomics of stem cells identifies new players in ricin toxicity, NATURE, 549, 538, 10.1038/nature24015 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3403 · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/cwn063 · DOI
- Xiao H , Sun F , Suttapitugsakul S , Wu R (2019) Global and site-specific analysis of protein glycosylation in complex biological systems with Mass Spectrometry. MASS SPECTROM REV. · DOI
- 2016, pGlyco: a pipeline for the identification of intact N-glycopeptides by using HCD- and CID-MS/MS and MS3, Sci Rep, 6, 25102, 10.1038/srep25102 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, P., Xie, J.-J., Sang, S.-M., Zhang, L., Liu, M.-Q., Yang, L.-J., Xu, Y.-T., Yan, G.-Q., Yao, J., Gao, X., Qian, W.-J., Wang, Z.-F., Zhang, Y., Yang, P.-Y., & Shen, H.-L.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Yang
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2019-04-22
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 867-874
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990324610
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (16ZR1402400)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570825)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFA0507501, 2016YFB0201702, 2017YFA0505001)
- Fudan University
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0507501, 2017YFA0505001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, N-glycosylation, N-glycoproteomics, APP/PS1 mice, N-glycan profiling, glutamate receptors, fucosylated glycans, high-mannose glycans, brain proteome, neuronal dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cell Line, Glycopeptides, Glycoproteins, Glycosylation, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Polysaccharides, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteome, Proteomics, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review