PreprintCited by 29Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Transcriptional terminators allow leak-free chromosomal integration of genetic constructs in cyanobacteria

Open access
Kelly, Ciarán L., Taylor, George M., Satkute, Aiste, Dekker, Linda, Heap, John T.·2019·Microorganisms

Preprint — published as 10.3390/microorganisms7080263

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are promising candidates for sustainable bioproduction of chemicals from sunlight and carbon dioxide. However, the genetics and metabolism of cyanobacteria are less well understood than model heterotrophic organisms, and the suite of well characterised cyanobacterial genetic tools and parts is less mature and complete. Transcriptional terminators use specific RNA structures to halt transcription and are routinely used in both natural and recombinant contexts to achieve independent control of gene expression and ‘insulate’ genes and operons from one another. Insulating gene expression can be particularly important when heterologous/synthetic genetic constructs are inserted at genomic locations where transcriptional read-through from chromosomal promoters occurs, resulting in poor control of expression of the introduced genes. To date, few terminators have been described and characterised in cyanobacteria. In this work, nineteen heterologous, synthetic or putative native Rho-independent (intrinsic) terminators were tested in the model freshwater cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, from which eleven strong terminators were identified. A subset of these strong terminators was then used to successfully insulate a chromosomally-integrated rhamnose-inducible rhaBAD expression system from hypothesised ‘read-through’ from a neighbouring chromosomal promoter, resulting in greatly improved inducible control. The addition of validated strong terminators to the cyanobacterial toolkit will allow improved independent control of introduced genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/689281

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimisation strategies for operon-based pathways often include modifying RBS, altering gene order within the operon, or adding transcriptional terminators to balance expression and reduce unintended transcriptional interactions.

    “Consequently, optimisation strategies often include modifying RBS, altering gene order within the operon, or adding transcriptional terminators to balance expression and reduce unintended transcriptional interactions [150].”

    From Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression (2026) · cites this paper as [150]

    The Discussion reports that strong terminators insulated an integrated expression construct from transcriptional read-through and enabled independent control of expression units in a metabolic pathway. The Introduction mentions ribosome-binding sites as genetic parts, but the supplied passages do not support modifying RBS or altering gene order as optimisation strategies. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 16 · Cited by 29

Authors
Kelly, C. L., Taylor, G. M., Satkute, A., Dekker, L., & Heap, J. T.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heap, John T.
Venue
Microorganisms
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-07-02
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
263-263
ISSN
2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967109725
Cited by
29
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011321/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
transcription terminator, cyanobacteria, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, rho-independent terminator, chromosomal integration, readthrough, synthetic biology, heterologous expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review