PreprintCited by 6Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Molecular Networks and Key Regulators of the Dysregulated Neuronal System in Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Wang, Minghui, Li, Aiqun, Sekiya, Michiko, Beckmann, Noam D., Quan, Xiuming, Schrode, Nadine, Fernando, Michael B., Yu, Alex +31 more·2019·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

SUMMARY: To study the molecular mechanisms driving the pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets of late onset Alzheimer’s Disease (LOAD), we performed an integrative network analysis of whole-genome DNA and RNA sequencing profiling of four cortical areas, including the parahippocampal gyrus, across 364 donors spanning the full spectrum of LOAD-related cognitive and neuropathological disease severities. Our analyses revealed thousands of molecular changes and uncovered for the first-time multiple neuron specific gene subnetworks most dysregulated in LOAD. ATP6V1A , a critical subunit of vacuolar-type H + -ATPase (v-ATPase), was predicted to be a key regulator of one neuronal subnetwork and its role in disease-related processes was evaluated through CRISPR-based manipulation of human induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons and RNAi-based knockdown in transgenic Drosophila models. This study advances our understanding of LOAD pathogenesis by providing the global landscape and detailed circuits of complex molecular interactions and regulations in several key brain regions affected by LOAD and the resulting network models provide a blueprint for developing next generation therapeutics against LOAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/788323

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PHG is most vulnerable in AD as manifested by marked transcriptomic dysregulation.

    “The results are consistent with previous DEG analyses (19) of the MSBB-AD transcriptomic data and suggest that the PHG is most vulnerable in AD as manifested by marked transcriptomic dysregulation.”
  • A particular candidate compound identified using molecular signature data alone using an in silico drug repositioning algorithm was able to increase the expression level of ATP6V1A and restore long-term potentiation and memory formation in both cultured neurons and AD mouse models.

    “For instance, a particular candidate compound identified using molecular signature data alone using an in silico drug repositioning algorithm (47) was able to increase the expression level of ATP6V1A and restore long-term potentiation and memory formation in both cultured neurons and AD mouse models (19).”

    From Molecular subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease using RNA sequencing data reveals novel mechanisms and targets (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Wang, M., et al. Integrative Network Analysis of Nineteen Brain Regions Identifies Molecular Signatures and Networks Underlying Selective Regional Vulnerability to Alzheimer's Disease. Genome Medicine 8, 104 (2016).
  2. Wang, M., et al. The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer's disease. Scientific Data 5, 180185 (2018).
  3. Zhu, J., et al. Increasing the Power to Detect Causal Associations by Combining Genotypic and Expression Data in Segregating Populations. PLOS Computational Biology 3, e69 (2007).
  4. Satoh, J.-i., Yamamoto, Y., Asahina, N., Kitano, S. & Kino, Y. RNA-Seq Data Mining: Downregulation of NeuroD6 Serves as a Possible Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease Brains. Disease Markers 2014, 10 (2014).
  5. Blalock, E.M., et al. Incipient Alzheimer's disease: Microarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 2173-2178 (2004).
  6. Végh, M.J., et al. Reducing hippocampal extracellular matrix reverses early memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathologica Communications 2, 76 (2014).
  7. Ariga, T., Miyatake, T. & Yu, R.K. Role of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: amyloidogenesis and therapeutic strategies--a review. Journal of neuroscience research 88, 2303-2315 (2010).
  8. Guerreiro, R., et al. TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 368, 117-127 (2013).
  9. Song, W.-M. & Zhang, B. Multiscale Embedded Gene Co-expression Network Analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 11, e1004574 (2015).
  10. Cohain, A., et al. EXPLORING THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF PROBABILISTIC CAUSAL MOLECULAR NETWORK MODELS. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 22, 120-131 (2017).
  11. Zhang, B. & Zhu, J. Identification of key causal regulators in gene networks. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering II(2013).
  12. Murphy, M.P. & LeVine, H., 3rd. Alzheimer's disease and the amyloid-beta peptide. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 19, 311-323 (2010).
  13. Zhu, Z., et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nature Genetics 48, 481 (2016).
  14. Tampellini, D. Synaptic activity and Alzheimer's disease: a critical update. Front Neurosci 9, 423 (2015).
  15. Leshchyns'ka, I. & Sytnyk, V. Synaptic Cell Adhesion Molecules in Alzheimer's Disease. Neural Plast 2016, 6427537 (2016).
  16. Kim, D., et al. FK506, an Immunosuppressive Drug, Induces Autophagy by Binding to the V- ATPase Catalytic Subunit A in Neuronal Cells. Journal of proteome research 16, 55-64 (2017).
  17. Egan, M.F., et al. Randomized Trial of Verubecestat for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 378, 1691-1703 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, M., Li, A., Sekiya, M., Beckmann, N. D., Quan, X., Schrode, N., Fernando, M. B., Yu, A., Zhu, L., Cao, J., Lyu, L., Horgusluoglu, E., Wang, Q., Guo, L., Wang, Y.-S., Neff, R., Song, W.-M., Wang, E., Shen, Q., Zhou, X., Ming, C., Ho, S.-M., Vatansever, S., Kaniskan, H. U., Jin, J., Zhou, M.-M., Ando, K., Ho, L., Slesinger, P. A., Yue, Z., Zhu, J., Gandy, S., Ehrlich, M. E., Cai, D., Haroutunian, V., Iijima, K. M., Schadt, E., Brennand, K. J., & Zhang, B.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Nagoya City University (JP)
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
  • Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Bin
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-10-01
OpenAlex
W2977611708
Cited by
6
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K08637)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG058635, R01AG057907, U01AG046170, RF1AG054014, RF1AG057440, R01AG062355, U01AG052411)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI111598)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK118243)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R03DE026814)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
late-onset Alzheimer's disease, molecular networks, ATP6V1A, vacuolar H+-ATPase, parahippocampal gyrus, cortical gene expression, disease severity, therapeutic target, human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons, Drosophila model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review