PreprintCited by 204Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

A genome-wide almanac of co-essential modules assigns function to uncharacterized genes

Open access
Wainberg, Michael, Kamber, Roarke A., Balsubramani, Akshay, Meyers, Robin M., Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa, Hornburg, Daniel, Jiang, Lihua, Chan, Joanne +8 more·2019·Nature Genetics

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41588-021-00840-z · Paper page

Abstract

SUMMARY: A central remaining question in the post-genomic era is how genes interact to form biological pathways. Measurements of gene dependency across hundreds of cell lines have been used to cluster genes into ‘co-essential’ pathways, but this approach has been limited by ubiquitous false positives. Here, we develop a statistical method that enables robust identification of gene co-essentiality and yields a genome-wide set of functional modules. This almanac recapitulates diverse pathways and protein complexes and predicts the functions of 102 uncharacterized genes. Validating top predictions, we show that TMEM189 encodes plasmanylethanolamine desaturase, the long-sought key enzyme for plasmalogen synthesis. We also show that C15orf57 binds the AP2 complex, localizes to clathrin-coated pits, and enables efficient transferrin uptake. Finally, we provide an interactive web tool for the community to explore the results (coessentiality.net). Our results establish co-essentiality profiling as a powerful resource for biological pathway identification and discovery of novel gene functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/827071

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-essential genes were determined from Wainberg et al., 2019, which scored co-essentiality across genome-wide CRISPR screens in 485 cancer cell lines.

    “Co-essential genes were determined from Wainberg et al., 2019, which scored co-essentiality of genes across genome-wide CRISPR screens in 485 cancer cell lines (Meyers et al., 2017) using a generalized least-squares regression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Aitkin, A.C. (1935). On least squares and linear combination of observations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 55, 42-48.
  2. Chen, J., and Wagner, E.J. (2010). snRNA 3' end formation: the dawn of the Integrator complex. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 1082-1087.
  3. Choobdar, S., Ahsen, M.E., Crawford, J., Tomasoni, M., Fang, T., Lamparter, D., Lin, J., Hescott, B., Hu, X., Mercer, J., et al. (2019). Assessment of network module identification not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184-191.
  4. Fletcher, M.N.C., Castro, M.A.A., Wang, X., de Santiago, I., O'Reilly, M., Chin, S.-F., Rueda, O.M., Caldas, C., Ponder, B.A.J., Markowetz, F., et al. (2013). Master regulators of FGFR2 signalling and breast cancer risk. Nat. Commun. 4, 2464.
  5. Liu, Y., and Xie, J. (2019). Cauchy Combination Test: A Powerful Test With Analytic p-Value Calculation Under Arbitrary Dependency Structures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1-18.
  6. Liu, Y., Chen, S., Li, Z., Morrison, A.C., Boerwinkle, E., and Lin, X. (2019). ACAT: A Fast and Powerful p Value Combination Method for Rare-Variant Analysis in Sequencing Studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics 104, 410-421.
  7. McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., and Großberger, L. (2018). UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. Journal of Open Source Software 3, 861.
  8. Rosenbluh, J., Mercer, J., Shrestha, Y., Oliver, R., Tamayo, P., Doench, J.G., Tirosh, I., Piccioni, F., Hartenian, E., Horn, H., et al. (2016). Genetic and Proteomic Interrogation of Lower not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Confidence Candidate Genes Reveals Signaling Networks in β-Catenin-Active Cancers. Cell Syst 3, 302-316.
  9. Shurtleff, M.J., Itzhak, D.N., Hussmann, J.A., Schirle Oakdale, N.T., Costa, E.A., Jonikas, M., Weibezahn, J., Popova, K.D., Jan, C.H., Sinitcyn, P., et al. (2018). The ER membrane protein not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D331-D338.
  10. Wang, X., Li, G., Koul, S., Ohki, R., Maurer, M., Borczuk, A., and Halmos, B. (2018). PHLDA2 is not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. a key oncogene-induced negative feedback inhibitor of EGFR/ErbB2 signaling via interference with AKT signaling. Oncotarget 9, 24914.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wainberg, M., Kamber, R. A., Balsubramani, A., Meyers, R. M., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Hornburg, D., Jiang, L., Chan, J., Jian, R., Gu, M., Shcherbina, A., Dubreuil, M. M., Spees, K., Snyder, M. P., Kundaje, A., & Bassik, M. C.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kundaje, Anshul
  • Bassik, Michael C.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
638-649
ISSN
1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155528889
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2hd084069-01)
  • Stanford Bio-X
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG009436)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009302)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DP2GM123485)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP2 HD084069)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
gene dependency, functional modules, plasmalogen synthesis, AP-2, clathrin-coated pits, transferrin uptake, protein complexes, cell lines
MeSH terms
Clathrin, Endocytosis, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, HeLa Cells, Humans, Neoplasms, Plasmalogens, Signal Transduction, Genome, Epigenesis, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review