Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonvesicular Lipid Transfer from the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Lev, S.·2012·Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/cshperspect.a013300

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fagone P, Jackowski S. 2009. Membrane phospholipid syn- thesis and endoplasmic reticulum function. J Lipid Res 50: S311-S316.
  2. Holthuis JC, van Meer G, Huitema K. 2003. Lipid micro- domains, lipid translocation and the organization of in- tracellular membrane transport (Review). Mol Membr Biol 20: 231 -241.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lev, S.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
a013300-a013300
ISSN
1943-0264
Cited by
103
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review