Cited by 90Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Synthetic Lethal Vulnerabilities in KRAS-Mutant Cancers

Open access
Aguirre, Andrew J., Hahn, William C.·2018·Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine

Abstract

-mutant cancers, including the results of numerous functional genetic screens aimed at identifying KRAS synthetic lethal targets. Importantly, many of these vulnerabilities may represent tractable therapeutic opportunities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/cshperspect.a031518

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome-wide RNAi and CRISPR screens have identified many synthetic lethal partners of KRAS, many of which are druggable.

    “A number of synthetic lethal genes have been identified using genome-wide RNAi and CRISPR screens, and many of these are druggable targets (32, 33).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

  • Inhibition of these stress-response pathways exacerbates oncogenic stress in KRAS mutant cells and impairs their viability.

    “Inhibition of these pathways therefore exacerbates oncogenic stress in KRAS mutant cells and impairs their viability (32, 33).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 136 · Cited by 90

Authors
Aguirre, A. J., & Hahn, W. C.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hahn, William C.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
Published
2017-11-03
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
a031518
ISSN
2157-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766798501
Cited by
90
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard Catalyst (UL1-TR-001102, TR001102)
  • Hope Funds for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001102)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA127003, U01CA176058, P01CA154303, U01CA199253, R01CA130988)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
KRAS mutation, synthetic lethality, functional genetic screens, KRAS-mutant cancer, cancer therapeutics, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review