The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution
Open accessAbstract
Cocrystal structures of wild-type TATA box-binding protein (TBP) recognizing 10 naturally occurring TATA elements have been determined at 2.3-1.8 A resolution, and compared with our 1.9 A resolution structure of TBP bound to the Adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP) TATA box (5'-TATAAAAG-3'). Minor-groove recognition by the saddle-shaped protein induces the same conformational change in each of these oligonucleotides, despite variations in promoter sequence that reduce the efficiency of transcription initiation. Three molecular mechanisms explain assembly of diverse TBP-TATA element complexes. (1) T --> A and A --> T transversions leave the minor-groove face unchanged, permitting formation of TBP-DNA complexes on many A/T-rich core promoter sequences. (2) Cavities in the interface between TBP and the minor-groove face of the AdMLP TATA box accommodate the exocyclic NH(2) groups of G in a TACA box and in a TATAAG box. (3) Formation of a C:G Hoogsteen basepair in a TATAAAC box eliminates steric clashes that would be produced by the Watson-Crick base pair. We conclude that the structure of the TBP-TATA box complex found at the heart of the polymerase II (pol II) transcription machinery has remained constant over the course of evolution, despite variations in TBP and its DNA targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
[20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode
Otwinowski, Z., & Minor, W. (1997) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(97)76066-x · Cited by 33,475
PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889892009944 · Cited by 24,581
Cited by
Eukaryotic core promoters and the functional basis of transcription initiation
Haberle, V., & Stark, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0028-8 · Cited by 774
Evolution of multisubunit RNA polymerases in the three domains of life
Werner, F., & Grohmann, D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2507 · Cited by 431
Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA
Nikolova, E. N., Kim, E., Wise, A. A., O’Brien, P. J., Andricioaei, I., & Al-Hashimi, H. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09775 · Cited by 344
Replication of a cis–syn thymine dimer at atomic resolution
Ling, H., Boudsocq, F., Plosky, B. S., Woodgate, R., & Yang, W. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01919 · Cited by 216
The c‐myc Promoter: Still MysterY and Challenge
(2008) · Advances in Cancer Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-230x(07)99004-1 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Patikoglou, G. A., Kim, J. L., Sun, L., Yang, S.-H., Kodadek, T., & Burley, S. K.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1999-12-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3217-3230
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139448426
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.13.24.3217
- The paper
- Patikoglou, G. A., Kim, J. L., Sun, L., Yang, S.-H., Kodadek, T., & Burley, S. K. (1999). TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.24.3217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.