The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors
Open accessAbstract
The winged helix/forkhead class of transcription factors is characterized by a 100-amino-acid, monomeric DNAbinding domain. The structure of the DNA-binding domain of one of the class members, hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 g (HNF3g), in a complex with a DNA target has been solved (Clark et al. 1993). The DNA-binding domain folds into a variant of the helix–turn–helix motif and is made up of three a helices and two characteristic large loops, or “wings.” Therefore, the DNA-binding motif has been named the winged helix DNA-binding domain. Over the past 9 years since the identification of the first member of this class, the Drosophila melanogaster gene Fork head, >100 members of this gene family have been identified (for review, see Kaufmann and Knöchel 1996) in species ranging from yeast to human. The rapid accumulation of sequences by many different laboratories has led to the use of multiple names and classification systems, making it very difficult to follow the literature and to name newly characterized winged helix/ forkhead transcription factors. This problem was recognized and discussed at the first International Meeting on Forkhead/Winged Helix Proteins, held in La Jolla, California, in November 1998. At that time a proposal was developed to standardize the nomenclature for these proteins. Fox (Forkhead box) was adopted as the unified symbol for all chordate winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. A winged helix/forkhead nomenclature committee was elected to implement this proposal, in consultation with the community at large. This final proposal has been endorsed by >20 scientists as well as the Human and Mouse Gene Nomenclature Committees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chang, F., Lee, J. T., Navolanic, P. M., Steelman, L. S., Shelton, J. G., Blalock, W. L., Franklin, R. A., & McCubrey, J. A. (2003) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402824 · Cited by 1,176
Kregel, K. C., & Zhang, H. J. (2007) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00327.2006 · Cited by 883
Brunet, A., Park, J., Tran, H., Hu, L. S., Hemmings, B. A., & Greenberg, M. E. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.21.3.952-965.2001 · Cited by 860
Redox regulation of FoxO transcription factors
Klotz, L.-O., Sánchez-Ramos, C., Prieto-Arroyo, I., Urbánek, P., Steinbrenner, H., & Monsalve, M. (2015) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.019 · Cited by 747
Forkhead box proteins: tuning forks for transcriptional harmony.
Lam, E. W.-F., Brosens, J. J., Gomes, A. R., & Koo, C.-Y. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3539 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaestner, K. H., Knöchel, W., & Martínez, D. E.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2000-01-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-146
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2113002082
- Cited by
- 1,158
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.14.2.142
- The paper
- Kaestner, K. H., Knöchel, W., & Martínez, D. E. (2000). Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.14.2.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.