The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduced fidelity of branch point recognition and alternative splicing induced by the anti-tumor drug spliceostatin A
Open accessAbstract
Spliceostatin A (SSA) is a stabilized derivative of a Pseudomonas bacterial fermentation product that displays potent anti-proliferative and anti-tumor activities in cancer cells and animal models. The drug inhibits pre-mRNA splicing in vitro and in vivo and binds SF3b, a protein subcomplex of U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), which is essential for recognition of the pre-mRNA branch point. We report that SSA prevents interaction of an SF3b 155-kDa subunit with the pre-mRNA, concomitant with nonproductive recruitment of U2 snRNP to sequences 5′ of the branch point. Differences in base-pairing potential with U2 snRNA in this region lead to different sensitivity of 3′ splice sites to SSA, and to SSA-induced changes in alternative splicing. Indeed, rather than general splicing inhibition, splicing-sensitive microarray analyses reveal specific alternative splicing changes induced by the drug that significantly overlap with those induced by knockdown of SF3b 155. These changes lead to down-regulation of genes important for cell division, including cyclin A2 and Aurora A kinase, thus providing an explanation for the anti-proliferative effects of SSA. Our results reveal a mechanism that prevents nonproductive base-pairing interactions in the spliceosome, and highlight the regulatory and cancer therapeutic potential of perturbing the fidelity of splice site recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth
Christofk, H. R., Vander Heiden, M. G., Harris, M. H., Ramanathan, A., Gerszten, R. E., Wei, R., Fleming, M. D., Schreiber, S. L., & Cantley, L. C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06734 · Cited by 2,820
U1 snRNP protects pre-mRNAs from premature cleavage and polyadenylation
Kaida, D., Berg, M. G., Younis, I., Kasim, M., Singh, L. N., Wan, L., & Dreyfuss, G. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09479 · Cited by 638
Cited by
RNA splicing dysregulation and the hallmarks of cancer
Bradley, R. K., & Anczuków, O. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00541-7 · Cited by 579
Therapeutic targeting of splicing in cancer
Lee, S. C.-W., & Abdel-Wahab, O. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4165 · Cited by 561
Urbanski, L. M., Leclair, N., & Anczuków, O. (2018) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.1476 · Cited by 389
Ferreira, P. G., Jares, P., Rico, D., Gómez-López, G., Martínez-Trillos, A., Villamor, N., Ecker, S., González-Pérez, A., Knowles, D. G., Monlong, J., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.152132.112 · Cited by 214
Structural basis of splicing modulation by antitumor macrolide compounds
Cretu, C., Agrawal, A. A., Cook, A., Will, C. L., Fekkes, P., Smith, P. G., Lührmann, R., Larsen, N., Buonamici, S., & Pena, V. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.011 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Corrionero, A., Miñana, B., & Valcárcel, J.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-459
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2153489172
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced fidelity of branch point recognition and alternative splicing induced by the anti-tumor drug spliceostatin A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.2014311
- The paper
- Corrionero, A., Miñana, B., & Valcárcel, J. (2011). Reduced fidelity of branch point recognition and alternative splicing induced by the anti-tumor drug spliceostatin A. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2014311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.