PreprintCited by 100Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyNF-κB Signaling Pathways

A novel enhancer in the immunoglobulin lambda locus is duplicated and functionally independent of NF kappa B.

Open access
Hagman, J, Rudin, C M, Haasch, D, Chaplin, D, Storb, U·1990·Genes & Development

Abstract

As a first step toward defining the elements necessary for lambda immunoglobulin gene regulation, DNase I hypersensitive sites were mapped in the mouse lambda locus. A hypersensitive site found 15.5 kb downstream of C lambda 4 was present in all the B-cell but not in the T-cell lines tested. This site coincided with a strong B-cell-specific transcriptional enhancer (E lambda 2-4). This novel enhancer is active in myeloma cells, regardless of the status of endogenous lambda genes, but is inactive in a T-cell line and in fibroblasts. The enhancer E lambda 2-4 functions in the absence of the transcription factor NF kappa B, which is necessary for kappa enhancer function. No evidence could be found for NF kappa B binding by this element. Rearrangement of V lambda 2 to JC lambda 3 or JC lambda genes deletes E lambda 2-4; however, a second strong enhancer was found 35 kb downstream of C lambda 1, which cannot be eliminated by lambda gene rearrangements. The second lambda enhancer (E lambda 3-1) is 90% homologous to the E lambda 2-4 sequence in the region determined to comprise the active enhancer and likewise lacks the consensus binding site for NF kappa B. The data support a model for the independent activation of kappa and lambda gene expression based on locus-specific regulation at the enhancer level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.4.6.978

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each enhancer contains an essential composite site (λB) bound by PU.1 and Pip.

    “Each enhancer contains an essential composite site (λB) bound by PU.1 and Pip”

    From Assembly requirements of PU.1–Pip (IRF‐4) activator complexes: inhibiting function in vivo using fused dimers (1999) · cites this paper as Hagman et al., 1990

    The Abstract identifies two lambda enhancers, and “Cloning of a second enhancer and comparison with” discusses conserved sequence motifs. Neither passage identifies an essential λB composite site or reports binding by PU.1 and Pip; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 100

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hagman, J. 1989. Murine immunoglobulin lambda genes are regulated by downstream enhancer elements. Ph.D. thesis. University of Washington, Seattle.
  2. Miller, J. 1983. The mouse immunoglobulin k light chain gene family. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

Authors
Hagman, J., Rudin, C. M., Haasch, D., Chaplin, D., & Storb, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1990-06
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
978-992
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2040720915
Cited by
100
References
82
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01gm038649-10a1)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007281, GM-07281, GM-38649)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-24780)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
Keywords
enhancers, DNase I hypersensitive sites, myeloma cells
MeSH terms
Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Base Sequence, Binding, Competitive, Cell Line, Cloning, Molecular, Cosmids, Deoxyribonuclease I, DNA-Binding Proteins, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Immunoglobulin, Immunoglobulin lambda-Chains, Molecular Sequence Data, T-Lymphocytes, Transcription Factors, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Restriction Mapping, NF-kappa B

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review