PreprintCited by 325Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationRNA Research and Splicing

Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications

Open access
Andersson, Robin, Enroth, Stefan, Rada-Iglesias, Alvaro, Wadelius, Claes, Komorowski, Jan·2009·Genome Research

Abstract

The genomes of higher organisms are packaged in nucleosomes with functional histone modifications. Until now, genome-wide nucleosome and histone modification studies have focused on transcription start sites (TSSs) where nucleosomes in RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) occupied genes are well positioned and have histone modifications that are characteristic of expression status. Using public data, we here show that there is a higher nucleosome-positioning signal in internal human exons and that this positioning is independent of expression. We observed a similarly strong nucleosome-positioning signal in internal exons of Caenorhabditis elegans . Among the 38 histone modifications analyzed in man, H3K36me3, H3K79me1, H2BK5me1, H3K27me1, H3K27me2, and H3K27me3 had evidently higher signals in internal exons than in the following introns and were clearly related to exon expression. These observations are suggestive of roles in splicing. Thus, exons are not only characterized by their coding capacity, but also by their nucleosome organization, which seems evolutionarily conserved since it is present in both primates and nematodes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.092353.109

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 325

Authors
Andersson, R., Enroth, S., Rada-Iglesias, A., Wadelius, C., & Komorowski, J.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2009-08-17
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1732-1741
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964188377
Cited by
325
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
nucleosome positioning, histone modifications, exons, introns, H3K36me3, H3K27me1, H3K27me2, H3K27me3, RNA polymerase II, transcription start sites, splicing, exon expression, Caenorhabditis elegans, human genome, evolutionary conservation
MeSH terms
Histone Methyltransferases, Animals, Caenorhabditis, Cells, Cultured, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Humans, Nucleosomes, Primates, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Transcription, Genetic, Alternative Splicing, Gene Order, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review