The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: recommendations on fixatives for long-term storage and prospective studies.
Open accessAbstract
The development of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNA amplification methods has afforded molecular studies of fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples and other archival material. Some fixation methods damage DNA, and thus deleteriously affect subsequent PCR analysis. This study addressed the effect of short- and long-term storage (2 hr to 30 days) in a variety of fixatives (10% buffered-neutral formalin [BNF], 95% ethanol, acetone, and OmniFix) before paraffin embedding. We tested the ability of prepared tissue sections to yield DNA amplification products ranging from 268 to 1327 bp. Results indicated that tissues fixed for 8 days in BNF were able to amplify 536-bp but very little 989-bp DNA fragments; after 30 days of BNF fixation only a 268-bp fragment was amplifiable. Samples fixed in OmniFix and acetone yielded products of 989 and 1327 bp, respectively, after 8 days of fixation; both fixatives yielded 989-bp amplification products after 30 days of fixation. Tissues fixed in 95% ethanol for up to 30 days efficiently produced DNA amplification fragments of up to 1327 bp in length. The results provide important information for prospective studies that involve PCR analysis from archival material. Furthermore, fixation and long-term storage in ethanol should prove particularly useful in remote areas where refrigeration or immediate sample-processing is unavailable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Variant-Sequence Transthyretin (Isoleucine 122) in Late-Onset Cardiac Amyloidosis in Black Americans
Jacobson, D. R., Pastore, R. D., Yaghoubian, R., Kane, I., Gallo, G., Buck, F. S., & Buxbaum, J. N. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199702133360703 · Cited by 554
General concepts for PCR primer design.
Dieffenbach, C. W., Lowe, T. M., & Dveksler, G. S. (1993) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3.3.s30 · Cited by 484
Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ)
Moore, H. M., Kelly, A. B., Jewell, S. D., McShane, L. M., Clark, D. P., Greenspan, R., Hayes, D. F., Hainaut, P., Kim, P., Mansfield, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200021n · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Greer, C. E., Lund, J. K., & Manos, M. M.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-50
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089418794
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: recommendations on fixatives for long-term storage and prospective studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.1.1.46
- The paper
- Greer, C. E., Lund, J. K., & Manos, M. M. (1991). PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: recommendations on fixatives for long-term storage and prospective studies. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1.1.46
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.