CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rice Transposable Elements: A Survey of 73,000 Sequence-Tagged-Connectors

Mao, Long, Wood, Todd C., Yu, Yeisoo, Budiman, Muhammad A., Tomkins, Jeff, Woo, Sung-sick, Sasinowski, Maciek, Presting, Gernot, Frisch, David, Goff, Steve, Dean, Ralph A., Wing, Rod A.·2000·Genome Research
DOI 10.1101/gr.10.7.982
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As part of an international effort to sequence the rice genome, the Clemson University Genomics Institute is developing a sequence-tagged-connector (STC) framework. This framework includes the generation of deep-coverage BAC libraries from O. sativa ssp.japonica c.v. Nipponbare and the sequencing of both ends of the genomic DNA insert of the BAC clones. Here, we report a survey of the transposable elements (TE) in >73,000 STCs. A total of 6848 STCs were found homologous to regions of known TE sequences (E<10−5) by FASTX search of STCs against a set of 1358 TE protein sequences obtained from GenBank. Of these TE-containing STCs (TE–STCs), 88% (6027) are related to retroelements and the remaining are transposase homologs. Nearly all DNA transposons known previously in plants were present in the STCs, including maize Ac/Ds,En/Spm, Mutator, and mariner-like elements. In addition, 2746 STCs were found to contain regions homologous to known miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs). The distribution of these MITEs in regions near genes was confirmed by EST comparisons to MITE-containing STCs, and our results showed that the association of MITEs with known EST transcripts varies by MITE type. Unlike the biased distribution of retroelements in maize, we found no evidence for the presence of gene islands when we correlated TE–STCs with a physical map of the CUGI BAC library. These analyses of TEs in nearly 50 Mb of rice genomic DNA provide an interesting and informative preview of the rice genome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.10.7.982

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Budiman M.A. (1999) “Construction and characterization of deep coverage BAC libraries for two model crops: Tomato and rice, and initiation of a chromosome walk to jointless -2 in tomato”. Ph.D. thesis (Texas A & M University, College Station, TX).
  3. 10.1105/tpc.4.10.1283 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1411 · DOI
  5. 10.1105/tpc.6.6.907 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8524 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8135 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00485947 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.282.5389.656 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF00587581 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/27.6.1539 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13241 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s004380050933 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/45471 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF00017740 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00163756 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/47134 · DOI
  20. Miller, 1998, Retrotransposon-related DNA sequences in the centromeres of grass chromosomes., Genetics, 150, 1615, 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1615 · DOI
  21. Motohashi, 1996, Identification of Tnr3, a suppressor-mutator/enhancer-like transposable element from rice., Mol. Gen. Genet., 250, 148
  22. 10.1038/ng1296-380 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.4.325 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1006/geno.1997.4995 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/nar/28.1.141 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.274.5288.765 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/1695 · DOI
  29. Siegel, 1999, Analysis of sequence-tagged-connector strategies for DNA sequencing., Genome Res., 9, 297, 10.1101/gr.9.3.297 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s004380050755 · DOI
  31. States, 1991, Improved sensitivity of nucleic acid database searches using application-specific scoring matrices., Methods, 3, 66, 10.1016/S1046-2023(05)80165-3 · DOI
  32. 10.1105/tpc.12.3.381 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/381364a0 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0959-437X(95)80016-X · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1998.t01-1-00095.x · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1160 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Metadata

Authors
Mao, L., Wood, T. C., Yu, Y., Budiman, M. A., Tomkins, J., Woo, S.-S., Sasinowski, M., Presting, G., Frisch, D., Goff, S., Dean, R. A., & Wing, R. A.
Venue
Genome Research
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
982-990
ISSN
  • 1088-9051
  • 1549-5469
DOI
10.1101/gr.10.7.982
Cited by
156
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review