Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities
Open accessAbstract
The genetic code-the binding specificity of all transfer-RNAs--defines how protein primary structure is determined by DNA sequence. DNA also dictates when and where proteins are expressed, and this information is encoded in a pattern of specific sequence motifs that are recognized by transcription factors. However, the DNA-binding specificity is only known for a small fraction of the approximately 1400 human transcription factors (TFs). We describe here a high-throughput method for analyzing transcription factor binding specificity that is based on systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and massively parallel sequencing. The method is optimized for analysis of large numbers of TFs in parallel through the use of affinity-tagged proteins, barcoded selection oligonucleotides, and multiplexed sequencing. Data are analyzed by a new bioinformatic platform that uses the hundreds of thousands of sequencing reads obtained to control the quality of the experiments and to generate binding motifs for the TFs. The described technology allows higher throughput and identification of much longer binding profiles than current microarray-based methods. In addition, as our method is based on proteins expressed in mammalian cells, it can also be used to characterize DNA-binding preferences of full-length proteins or proteins requiring post-translational modifications. We validate the method by determining binding specificities of 14 different classes of TFs and by conf…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 441
- Authors
- Jolma, A., Kivioja, T., Toivonen, J., Cheng, L., Wei, G., Enge, M., Taipale, M., Vaquerizas, J. M., Yan, J., Sillanpää, M. J., Bonke, M., Palin, K., Talukder, S., Hughes, T. R., Luscombe, N. M., Ukkonen, E., & Taipale, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2010-04-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 861-873
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2877582
- OpenAlex
- W2152121035
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- transcription factor binding specificity, SELEX, next-generation sequencing, multiplexed sequencing, binding motifs, DNA-binding proteins, NFATc1, RFX3, protein dimerization, human transcription factors
- MeSH terms
- Affinity Labels, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription Factors, SELEX Aptamer Technique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review