The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The making of a new pathogen: Insights from comparative population genomics of the domesticated wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola and its wild sister species
Open accessAbstract
The fungus Mycosphaerellagraminicola emerged as a new pathogen of cultivated wheat during its domestication ∼11,000 yr ago. We assembled 12 high-quality full genome sequences to investigate the genetic footprints of selection in this wheat pathogen and closely related sister species that infect wild grasses. We demonstrate a strong effect of natural selection in shaping the pathogen genomes with only ∼3% of nonsynonymous mutations being effectively neutral. Forty percent of all fixed nonsynonymous substitutions, on the other hand, are driven by positive selection. Adaptive evolution has affected M. graminicola to the highest extent, consistent with recent host specialization. Positive selection has prominently altered genes encoding secreted proteins and putative pathogen effectors supporting the premise that molecular host–pathogen interaction is a strong driver of pathogen evolution. Recent divergence between pathogen sister species is attested by the high degree of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) in their genomes. We exploit ILS to generate a genetic map of the species without any crossing data, document recent times of species divergence relative to genome divergence, and show that gene-rich regions or regions with low recombination experience stronger effects of natural selection on neutral diversity. Emergence of a new agricultural host selected a highly specialized and fast-evolving pathogen with unique evolutionary patterns compared with its wild relatives. The strong impact of natural selection, we document, is at odds with the small effective population sizes estimated and suggest that population sizes were historically large but likely unstable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics
Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135848.001.0001 · Cited by 8,012
SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program
Li, R., Li, Y., Kristiansen, K., & Wang, J. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025 · Cited by 3,597
Self-citationThe limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast.
Lynch, M., Sung, W., Morris, K., Coffey, N., Landry, C. R., Dopman, E. B., Dickinson, W. J., Okamoto, K., Kulkarni, S., Hartl, D. L., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803466105 · Cited by 708
Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites
Karasov, T., Messer, P. W., & Petrov, D. A. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000924 · Cited by 257
The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome
Cruz, F., Vila, C., & Webster, M. T. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn177 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Genome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better
Raffaele, S., & Kamoun, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2790 · Cited by 732
Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens
Fones, H. N., Bebber, D. P., Chaloner, T. M., Kay, W. T., Steinberg, G., & Gurr, S. J. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0 · Cited by 640
The impact of Septoria tritici Blotch disease on wheat: An EU perspective
Fones, H., & Gurr, S. (2015) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.004 · Cited by 516
Evolution and genome architecture in fungal plant pathogens
Möller, M., & Stukenbrock, E. H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.76 · Cited by 432
Self-citationExtensive chromosomal reshuffling drives evolution of virulence in an asexual pathogen
de Jonge, R., Bolton, M. D., Kombrink, A., van den Berg, G. C. M., Yadeta, K. A., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.152660.112 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Stukenbrock, E. H., Bataillon, T., Dutheil, J. Y., Hansen, T. T., Li, R., Zala, M., McDonald, B. A., Wang, J., & Schierup, M. H.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2011-10-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2157-2166
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171758091
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The making of a new pathogen: Insights from comparative population genomics of the domesticated wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola and its wild sister species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.118851.110
- The paper
- Stukenbrock, E. H., Bataillon, T., Dutheil, J. Y., Hansen, T. T., Li, R., Zala, M., McDonald, B. A., Wang, J., & Schierup, M. H. (2011). The making of a new pathogen: Insights from comparative population genomics of the domesticated wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola and its wild sister species. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.118851.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.