Cited by 61Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFungal and yeast genetics research

A nucleosomal surface defines an integration hotspot for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ty1 retrotransposon

Open access
Baller, Joshua A., Gao, Jiquan, Stamenova, Radostina, Curcio, M. Joan, Voytas, Daniel F.·2012·Genome Research

Abstract

Ty1, the most abundant retrotransposon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , integrates preferentially upstream of genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III). Targeting is likely due to interactions between the Ty1 integration complex and a feature of chromatin characteristic of sites of Pol III transcription. To better understand Ty1 targeting determinants, >150,000 Ty1 insertions were mapped onto the S. cerevisiae genome sequence. Logistic regression was used to assess relationships between patterns of Ty1 integration and various genomic features, including genome-wide data sets of histone modifications and transcription-factor binding sites. Nucleosomes were positively associated with Ty1 insertions, and fine-scale mapping of insertions upstream of genes transcribed by Pol III indicated that Ty1 preferentially integrates into nucleosome-bound DNA near the H2A/H2B interface. Outside of genes transcribed by Pol III, Ty1 avoids coding sequences, a pattern that is not due to selection, but rather reflects a preference for nucleosome-rich sites flanking genes. Ty1 insertion sites were also mapped in four mutant lines that affect Ty1 transposition frequency or integration specificity ( rrm3 Δ, hos2 Δ, rtt109 Δ, and rad6 Δ). Patterns of integration were largely preserved in the mutants, although significantly more insertions into coding sequences were observed in the rad6 Δ strain, suggesting a loosening of target specificity in this mutant that lacks an enzyme involved in ubiquitinating H2A. Overall, our data suggest that nucleosomes are necessary for Ty1 integration, and that a secondary factor, likely a histone modification or nucleosome-bound factor enriched at sites of Pol III transcription, determines preferred target sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.129585.111

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same nucleosomal positions are favored by yeast retrotransposon Ty1 in vivo.

    “The same nucleosomal positions are favoured by yeast retrotransposon Ty1 in vivo63.”

    From Structure and function of retroviral integrase (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Chromatinized DNA has been shown to be a suitable or even preferred target for retroviral integration in vitro and in vivo.

    “Yet, chromatinized DNA was shown to be a suitable, or even preferred target for retroviral integration in vitro and in vivo59–64.”

    From Structure and function of retroviral integrase (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 61

Authors
Baller, J. A., Gao, J., Stamenova, R., Curcio, M. J., & Voytas, D. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Wadsworth Center (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
704-713
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163796139
Cited by
61
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM052072)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Ty1 retrotransposon, retrotransposition, nucleosome, RNA polymerase III transcription, histone modifications, transcription factor binding sites, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RRM3, Hos2, Rtt109, Rad6, histone H2A ubiquitination, insertion site mapping
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Chromosome Mapping, DNA, Fungal, Genes, Fungal, Histones, Models, Genetic, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nucleosomes, Protein Binding, RNA Polymerase III, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Surface Properties, Transcription, Genetic, Logistic Models, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Genome, Fungal, Retroelements, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes, Histone Acetyltransferases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review