Gene expression drives local adaptation in humans
Open accessAbstract
The molecular basis of adaptation—and, in particular, the relative roles of protein-coding versus gene expression changes—has long been the subject of speculation and debate. Recently, the genotyping of diverse human populations has led to the identification of many putative “local adaptations” that differ between populations. Here I show that these local adaptations are over 10-fold more likely to affect gene expression than amino acid sequence. In addition, a novel framework for identifying polygenic local adaptations detects recent positive selection on the expression levels of genes involved in UV radiation response, immune cell proliferation, and diabetes-related pathways. These results provide the first examples of polygenic gene expression adaptation in humans, as well as the first genome-scale support for the hypothesis that changes in gene expression have driven human adaptation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SNPs affecting gene expression in DNA damage response pathways show evidence of recent diversifying selection, with geographic frequency gradients correlated with environmental UV exposure.
“SNPs that affect gene expression in DNA damage response pathways show evidence of recent diversifying selection, exhibiting geographic frequency gradients that seem to be correlated with environmental UV exposure (7).”
From Evidence for recent, population-specific evolution of the human mutation rate (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Fraser, H. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fraser, Hunter B.
- ORCID
- Fraser, Hunter B.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2013-03-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1089-1096
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3698502
- OpenAlex
- W2044712627
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097171)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- local adaptation, gene expression, human populations, polygenic adaptation, positive selection, immune cell proliferation, diabetes mellitus, population genomics
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Biological, Cell Line, DNA Damage, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Selection, Genetic, Gene Expression, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review