Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication

Open access
Shinbrot, Eve, Henninger, Erin E., Weinhold, Nils, Covington, Kyle R., Göksenin, A. Yasemin, Schultz, Nikolaus, Chao, Hsu, Doddapaneni, HarshaVardhan, Muzny, Donna M., Gibbs, Richard A., Sander, Chris, Pursell, Zachary F., Wheeler, David A.·2014·Genome Research

Abstract

Tumors with somatic mutations in the proofreading exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE-exo*) exhibit a novel mutator phenotype, with markedly elevated TCT→TAT and TCG→TTG mutations and overall mutation frequencies often exceeding 100 mutations/Mb. Here, we identify POLE-exo* tumors in numerous cancers and classify them into two groups, A and B, according to their mutational properties. Group A mutants are found only in POLE, whereas Group B mutants are found in POLE and POLD1 and appear to be nonfunctional. In Group A, cell-free polymerase assays confirm that mutations in the exonuclease domain result in high mutation frequencies with a preference for C→A mutation. We describe the patterns of amino acid substitutions caused by POLE-exo* and compare them to other tumor types. The nucleotide preference of POLE-exo* leads to increased frequencies of recurrent nonsense mutations in key tumor suppressors such as TP53, ATM, and PIK3R1. We further demonstrate that strand-specific mutation patterns arise from some of these POLE-exo* mutants during genome duplication. This is the first direct proof of leading strand-specific replication by human POLE, which has only been demonstrated in yeast so far. Taken together, the extremely high mutation frequency and strand specificity of mutations provide a unique identifier of eukaryotic origins of replication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.174789.114

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Shinbrot, E., Henninger, E. E., Weinhold, N., Covington, K. R., Göksenin, A. Y., Schultz, N., Chao, H., Doddapaneni, H., Muzny, D. M., Gibbs, R. A., Sander, C., Pursell, Z. F., & Wheeler, D. A.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1740-1750
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2121356457
Cited by
278
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.174789.114
The paper
Shinbrot, E., Henninger, E. E., Weinhold, N., Covington, K. R., Göksenin, A. Y., Schultz, N., Chao, H., Doddapaneni, H., Muzny, D. M., Gibbs, R. A., Sander, C., Pursell, Z. F., & Wheeler, D. A. (2014). Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.174789.114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.