The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication
Open accessAbstract
Tumors with somatic mutations in the proofreading exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE-exo*) exhibit a novel mutator phenotype, with markedly elevated TCT→TAT and TCG→TTG mutations and overall mutation frequencies often exceeding 100 mutations/Mb. Here, we identify POLE-exo* tumors in numerous cancers and classify them into two groups, A and B, according to their mutational properties. Group A mutants are found only in POLE, whereas Group B mutants are found in POLE and POLD1 and appear to be nonfunctional. In Group A, cell-free polymerase assays confirm that mutations in the exonuclease domain result in high mutation frequencies with a preference for C→A mutation. We describe the patterns of amino acid substitutions caused by POLE-exo* and compare them to other tumor types. The nucleotide preference of POLE-exo* leads to increased frequencies of recurrent nonsense mutations in key tumor suppressors such as TP53, ATM, and PIK3R1. We further demonstrate that strand-specific mutation patterns arise from some of these POLE-exo* mutants during genome duplication. This is the first direct proof of leading strand-specific replication by human POLE, which has only been demonstrated in yeast so far. Taken together, the extremely high mutation frequency and strand specificity of mutations provide a unique identifier of eukaryotic origins of replication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer
Initiative, A. P. C. G., Alexandrov, L. B., ICGC Breast Cancer Consortium, ICGC MMML-Seq Consortium, PedBrain, I., Nik-Zainal, S., Wedge, D. C., Aparicio, S. A. J. R., Behjati, S., Biankin, A. V., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12477 · Cited by 9,660
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer-the Stable Evidence
Vilar, E., & Gruber, S. B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.237 · Cited by 1,063
Repair and Genetic Consequences of Endogenous DNA Base Damage in Mammalian Cells
Barnes, D. E., & Lindahl, T. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092448 · Cited by 753
Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism
Yang, W. (2011) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583510000181 · Cited by 692
Cited by
MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes
Blokzijl, F., Janssen, R., van Boxtel, R., & Cuppen, E. (2018) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-018-0539-0 · Cited by 660
Mutational landscape of aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Pickering, C. R., Zhou, J. H., Lee, J. J., Drummond, J. A., Peng, S. A., Saade, R. E., Tsai, K. Y., Curry, J. L., Tetzlaff, M. T., Lai, S. Y., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1768 · Cited by 612
Self-citationWRN helicase is a synthetic lethal target in microsatellite unstable cancers
Chan, E. M., Shibue, T., McFarland, J. M., Gaeta, B., Ghandi, M., Dumont, N., Gonzalez, A., McPartlan, J. S., Li, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1102-x · Cited by 458
Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair in Relation to DNA Replication
Kunkel, T. A., & Erie, D. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054722 · Cited by 432
Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
León‐Castillo, A., Britton, H., McConechy, M. K., McAlpine, J. N., Nout, R., Kommoss, S., Brucker, S. Y., Carlson, J. W., Epstein, E., Rau, T. T., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5372 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Shinbrot, E., Henninger, E. E., Weinhold, N., Covington, K. R., Göksenin, A. Y., Schultz, N., Chao, H., Doddapaneni, H., Muzny, D. M., Gibbs, R. A., Sander, C., Pursell, Z. F., & Wheeler, D. A.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2014-09-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1740-1750
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2121356457
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.174789.114
- The paper
- Shinbrot, E., Henninger, E. E., Weinhold, N., Covington, K. R., Göksenin, A. Y., Schultz, N., Chao, H., Doddapaneni, H., Muzny, D. M., Gibbs, R. A., Sander, C., Pursell, Z. F., & Wheeler, D. A. (2014). Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.174789.114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.