Transcription rate strongly affects splicing fidelity and cotranscriptionality in budding yeast
Open accessAbstract
The functional consequences of alternative splicing on altering the transcription rate have been the subject of intensive study in mammalian cells but less is known about effects of splicing on changing the transcription rate in yeast. We present several lines of evidence showing that slow RNA polymerase II elongation increases both cotranscriptional splicing and splicing efficiency and that faster elongation reduces cotranscriptional splicing and splicing efficiency in budding yeast, suggesting that splicing is more efficient when cotranscriptional. Moreover, we demonstrate that altering the RNA polymerase II elongation rate in either direction compromises splicing fidelity, and we reveal that splicing fidelity depends largely on intron length together with secondary structure and splice site score. These effects are notably stronger for the highly expressed ribosomal protein coding transcripts. We propose that transcription by RNA polymerase II is tuned to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of ribosomal protein gene expression, while allowing flexibility in splice site choice with the nonribosomal protein transcripts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Slow and fast RNA Pol II mutants often have the same effect on alternative exon inclusion or skipping, which is not predicted by the window of opportunity model.
“However, slow and fast RNA Pol II mutants often have the same effect on alternative exon inclusion or skipping (Fong et al, 2014; Aslanzadeh et al, 2018), which is not predicted by the “window of opportunity” model.”
From RNA polymerase II speed: a key player in controlling and adapting transcriptome composition (2021) · cites this paper as Aslanzadeh et al, 2018
In Results (“Altering RNAPII elongation rate affects splicing fidelity”; page unavailable), the paper reports that both fast and slow mutants increase use of an alternative upstream 3′ splice site in RPL26B, supporting the point that their effects need not be opposite. But its exon-skipping result concerns the fast mutant alone, not the same effect of both mutants on alternative exon inclusion or skipping. The Discussion describes the window-of-opportunity model but does not explicitly apply that comparison to exon inclusion or skipping. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe anti-correlation between transcription speed and splicing efficiency has been confirmed in budding yeast by RNA sequencing-based methods.
“This anti‐correlation between transcription speed and splicing efficiency has been confirmed in budding yeast by RNA sequencing‐based methods (Aslanzadeh et al, 2018).”
From RNA polymerase II speed: a key player in controlling and adapting transcriptome composition (2021) · cites this paper as Aslanzadeh et al, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Aslanzadeh, V., Huang, Y., Sanguinetti, G., & Beggs, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2017-12-18
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-213
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- PMC
- PMC5793784
- OpenAlex
- W2780135364
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SDL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome (104648, 092076)
- European Research Council (306999)
- Darwin Trust of Edinburgh
- University of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- co-transcriptional splicing, splicing fidelity, transcription rate, alternative splicing, intron length, RNA secondary structure, ribosomal protein genes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, spliceosome
- MeSH terms
- Saccharomycetales, Exons, Introns, RNA Polymerase II, RNA Splicing, Transcription, Genetic, Alternative Splicing, RNA Splice Sites, Transcription Elongation, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review