Cited by 5Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsProtist diversity and phylogeny

ISWI1 complex proteins facilitate developmental genome editing in Paramecium

Open access
Singh, Aditi, Häußermann, Lilia, Emmerich, Christiane, Nischwitz, Emily, Seah, Brandon K.B., Butter, Falk, Nowacki, Mariusz, Swart, Estienne C.·2025·Genome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

One of the most extensive forms of natural genome editing occurs in ciliates, a group of microbial eukaryotes. Ciliate germline and somatic genomes are contained in distinct nuclei within the same cell. During the massive reorganization process of somatic genome development, ciliates eliminate tens of thousands of DNA sequences from a germline genome copy. Recently, we showed that the chromatin remodeler ISWI1 is required for somatic genome development in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia . Here, we describe two high similarity paralogous proteins, ICOPa and ICOPb, essential for their genome editing. ICOPa and ICOPb are highly divergent from known proteins; the only domain detected showed distant homology with the WSD (WHIM2 + WHIM3) motif. We show that both ICOPa and ICOPb interact with the chromatin remodeler ISWI1. Upon ICOP knockdown, changes in alternative DNA excision boundaries and nucleosome densities are similar to those observed for ISWI1 knockdown. We thus propose that a complex comprising ISWI1 and either or both ICOPa and ICOPb are needed for Paramecium ’s precise genome editing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.278402.123

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Singh, A., Häußermann, L., Emmerich, C., Nischwitz, E., Seah, B. K. B., Butter, F., Nowacki, M., & Swart, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biology (DE)
  • Institute of Molecular Biology (DE)
  • Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Singh, Aditi
  • Swart, Estienne C.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2024-11-14
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
93-108
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W4404375541
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
germline genome, chromatin remodeling, Paramecium tetraurelia, ciliates, nucleosome density, protein complexes
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Paramecium, Protozoan Proteins, Paramecium tetraurelia, Genome, Protozoan, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review