ISWI1 complex proteins facilitate developmental genome editing in Paramecium
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
One of the most extensive forms of natural genome editing occurs in ciliates, a group of microbial eukaryotes. Ciliate germline and somatic genomes are contained in distinct nuclei within the same cell. During the massive reorganization process of somatic genome development, ciliates eliminate tens of thousands of DNA sequences from a germline genome copy. Recently, we showed that the chromatin remodeler ISWI1 is required for somatic genome development in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia . Here, we describe two high similarity paralogous proteins, ICOPa and ICOPb, essential for their genome editing. ICOPa and ICOPb are highly divergent from known proteins; the only domain detected showed distant homology with the WSD (WHIM2 + WHIM3) motif. We show that both ICOPa and ICOPb interact with the chromatin remodeler ISWI1. Upon ICOP knockdown, changes in alternative DNA excision boundaries and nucleosome densities are similar to those observed for ISWI1 knockdown. We thus propose that a complex comprising ISWI1 and either or both ICOPa and ICOPb are needed for Paramecium ’s precise genome editing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments
Roberts, A., & Pachter, L. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2251 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
Histones: annotating chromatin
Campos, E. I., & Reinberg, D. (2009) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.032608.103928 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Singh, A., Häußermann, L., Emmerich, C., Nischwitz, E., Seah, B. K. B., Butter, F., Nowacki, M., & Swart, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Biology (DE)
- Institute of Molecular Biology (DE)
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Aditi
- Swart, Estienne C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2024-11-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-108
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- PMC
- PMC11789628
- OpenAlex
- W4404375541
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Keywords
- germline genome, chromatin remodeling, Paramecium tetraurelia, ciliates, nucleosome density, protein complexes
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Paramecium, Protozoan Proteins, Paramecium tetraurelia, Genome, Protozoan, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review