Cited by 0Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Integration-free and cluster-free detection of localized differential gene coexpression in single-cell data with DiCoLo

Li, Ruiqi, Yang, Junchen, Su, Pei-Chun, Jaffe, Ariel, Lindenbaum, Ofir, Kluger, Yuval·2026·Genome Research

Abstract

Detecting changes in gene coordination patterns between biological conditions and identifying the cell populations in which these changes occur are key challenges in single-cell analysis. Existing approaches often compare gene coexpression between predefined cell clusters or rely on aligning cells across conditions. These strategies can be suboptimal when changes occur within small subpopulations or when batch effects obscure the underlying biological signal. To address these challenges, we introduce DiCoLo, a framework that identifies genes exhibiting differential colocalization, defined as changes in coordinated expression within localized cell neighborhoods - subsets of highly similar cells in the transcriptomic space. Importantly, DiCoLo does not rely on cell clustering or cross-condition alignment. For each condition, DiCoLo constructs a gene graph using Optimal Transport distances that reflect gene colocalization patterns across the cell manifold. Then, it identifies differential gene programs by detecting changes in connectivity patterns between the gene graphs. We show that DiCoLo robustly identifies differential gene colocalization even under weak signals or complex batch effects, outperforming existing methods across multiple benchmark datasets. When applied to mouse hair follicle development data, DiCoLo reveals coordinated gene programs and emerging cell populations driven by perturbations in morphogen signaling that underlie dermal condensate differentiation. Overall, these results establish DiCoLo as a powerful framework for uncovering localized differential transcriptional coordinated patterns in single-cell data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.282190.126

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Li, R., Yang, J., Su, P.-C., Jaffe, A., Lindenbaum, O., & Kluger, Y.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2026-10-26
Pages
gr.282190.126
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7223700826
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
genetic colocalization, single-cell transcriptomics, optimal transport, batch effects, cell populations, hair follicle development, morphogen signaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review