The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae
Open accessAbstract
We have used an ∼8.7-Mb BAC contig of Arabidopsis thaliana Chromosome 4 to trace homeologous chromosome regions in 21 species of the family Brassicaceae . Homeologs of this segment could be identified in all tested species. Painting of pachytene chromosomes of Calepina, Conringia , and Sisymbrium species (2 n = 14, 16), traditionally placed in tribe Brassiceae , showed one homeologous copy of the Arabidopsis contig, while the remaining taxa of the tribe (2 n = 14–30) revealed three, and three Brassica species (2 n = 34, 36, and 38) and Erucastrum gallicum (2 n = 30) had six copies corresponding to the 8.7-Mb segment. The multiple homeologous copies corresponded structurally to the Arabidopsis segment or were rearranged by inversions and translocations within the diploidized genomes. These chromosome rearrangements accompanied by chromosome fusions/fissions led to the present-day chromosome number variation within the Brassiceae . Phylogenetic relationships based on the chloroplast 5′- trn L (UAA)– trn F(GAA) region and estimated divergence times based on sequence data of the chalcone synthase gene are congruent with comparative painting data and place Calepina, Conringia , and Sisymbrium outside the clade of Brassiceae species with triplicated genomes. Most likely, species containing three or six copy pairs descended from a common hexaploid ancestor with basic genomes similar to that of Arabidopsis . The presumed hexaploidization event occurred after the Arabidopsis – Brassiceae split, between 7.9 and 14.6 Mya.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants
Panchy, N., Lehti-Shiu, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.00523 · Cited by 1,757
The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Tong, C., Edwards, D., Parkin, I. A. P., Zhao, M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Huang, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4930 · Cited by 1,161
Yang, J., Liu, D., Wang, X., Ji, C., Cheng, F., Liu, B., Hu, Z., Chen, S., Pental, D., Ju, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3657 · Cited by 580
The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes
Schranz, M. E., Lysak, M. A., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · Cited by 575
Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species
Lysak, M. A., Berr, A., Pecinka, A., Schmidt, R., McBreen, K., & Schubert, I. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510791103 · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lysak, M. A., Koch, M. A., Pecinka, A., & Schubert, I.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-03-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 516-525
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095645518
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.3531105
- The paper
- Lysak, M. A., Koch, M. A., Pecinka, A., & Schubert, I. (2005). Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3531105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.