The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array–CGH
Open accessAbstract
Structural genetic alterations in cancer often involve gene loss or gene amplification. With the advent of microarray approaches for the analysis of the genome, as exemplified by array–CGH (C omparative G enomic H ybridization), scanning for gene-dosage alterations is limited only by issues of DNA microarray density. However, samples of interest to the pathologist often comprise small clusters of just a few hundred cells, which do not provide sufficient DNA for array–CGH analysis. We sought to develop a simple method that would permit amplification of the whole genome without the use of thermocycling or ligation of DNA adaptors, because such a method would lend itself to the automated processing of a large number of tissue samples. We describe a method that permits the isothermal amplification of genomic DNA with high fidelity and limited sequence representation bias. The method is based on strand displacement reactions that propagate by a hyperbranching mechanism, and generate hundreds, or even thousands, of copies of the genome in a few hours. Using whole genome isothermal amplification, in combination with comparative genomic hybridization on cDNA microarrays, we demonstrate the ability to detect gene losses in yeast and gene dosage imbalances in human breast tumor cell lines. Although sequence representation bias in the amplified DNA presents potential problems for CGH analysis, these problems have been overcome by using amplified DNA in both control and tester samples. Gene-dosage alterations of threefold or more can be observed with high reproducibility with as few as 1000 cells of starting material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays
Yuen, T. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.10.e48 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer
Pinkel, D., & Albertson, D. G. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1569 · Cited by 585
Self-citationGenomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer
Albertson, D. G., & Pinkel, D. (2003) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddg261 · Cited by 371
Self-citationWu, L., Liu, X., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02738-05 · Cited by 293
Delwart, E. L. (2007) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.532 · Cited by 259
Loss of epigenetic silencing in tumors preferentially affects primate-specific retroelements
Szpakowski, S., Sun, X., Lage, J. M., Dyer, A., Rubinstein, J., Kowalski, D., Sasaki, C., Costa, J., & Lizardi, P. M. (2009) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.08.006 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lage, J. M., Leamon, J. H., Pejovic, T., Hamann, S., Lacey, M., Dillon, D., Segraves, R., Vossbrinck, B., González, A., Pinkel, D., Albertson, D. G., Costa, J., & Lizardi, P. M.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 294-307
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2153125376
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array–CGH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.377203
- The paper
- Lage, J. M., Leamon, J. H., Pejovic, T., Hamann, S., Lacey, M., Dillon, D., Segraves, R., Vossbrinck, B., González, A., Pinkel, D., Albertson, D. G., Costa, J., & Lizardi, P. M. (2003). Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array–CGH. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.377203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.