Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prominent use of distal 5′ transcription start sites and discovery of a large number of additional exons in ENCODE regions

Open access
Denoeud, France, Kapranov, Philipp, Ucla, Catherine, Frankish, Adam, Castelo, Robert, Drenkow, Jorg, Lagarde, Julien, Alioto, Tyler, Manzano, Caroline, Chrast, Jacqueline, Dike, Sujit, Wyss, Carine, Henrichsen, Charlotte N., Holroyd, Nancy, Dickson, Mark C., Taylor, Ruth, Hance, Zahra, Foissac, Sylvain, Myers, Richard M., Rogers, Jane, Hubbard, Tim, Harrow, Jennifer, Guigó, Roderic, Gingeras, Thomas R., Antonarakis, Stylianos E., Reymond, Alexandre·2007·Genome Research

Abstract

This report presents systematic empirical annotation of transcript products from 399 annotated protein-coding loci across the 1% of the human genome targeted by the Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE) pilot project using a combination of 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and high-density resolution tiling arrays. We identified previously unannotated and often tissue- or cell-line-specific transcribed fragments (RACEfrags), both 5′ distal to the annotated 5′ terminus and internal to the annotated gene bounds for the vast majority (81.5%) of the tested genes. Half of the distal RACEfrags span large segments of genomic sequences away from the main portion of the coding transcript and often overlap with the upstream-annotated gene(s). Notably, at least 20% of the resultant novel transcripts have changes in their open reading frames (ORFs), most of them fusing ORFs of adjacent transcripts. A significant fraction of distal RACEfrags show expression levels comparable to those of known exons of the same locus, suggesting that they are not part of very minority splice forms. These results have significant implications concerning (1) our current understanding of the architecture of protein-coding genes; (2) our views on locations of regulatory regions in the genome; and (3) the interpretation of sequence polymorphisms mapping to regions hitherto considered to be “noncoding,” ultimately relating to the identification of disease-related sequence alterations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.5660607

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Denoeud, F., Kapranov, P., Ucla, C., Frankish, A., Castelo, R., Drenkow, J., Lagarde, J., Alioto, T., Manzano, C., Chrast, J., Dike, S., Wyss, C., Henrichsen, C. N., Holroyd, N., Dickson, M. C., Taylor, R., Hance, Z., Foissac, S., Myers, R. M., Rogers, J., Hubbard, T., Harrow, J., Guigó, R., Gingeras, T. R., Antonarakis, S. E., & Reymond, A.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2007-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
746-759
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149129820
Cited by
198
References
4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prominent use of distal 5′ transcription start sites and discovery of a large number of additional exons in ENCODE regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.5660607
The paper
Denoeud, F., Kapranov, P., Ucla, C., Frankish, A., Castelo, R., Drenkow, J., Lagarde, J., Alioto, T., Manzano, C., Chrast, J., Dike, S., Wyss, C., Henrichsen, C. N., Holroyd, N., Dickson, M. C., Taylor, R., Hance, Z., Foissac, S., Myers, R. M., . . . Reymond, A. (2007). Prominent use of distal 5′ transcription start sites and discovery of a large number of additional exons in ENCODE regions. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5660607

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.