The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloning-Free PCR-Based Allele Replacement Methods
Open accessAbstract
Efficient homologous recombination permits the directed introduction of specific mutations into the yeast genome. Here we describe a cloning-free, PCR-based allele replacement method that simplifies allele transfer between yeast strains. The desired allele from one strain is amplified by PCR, along with a selectable/counterselectable marker. After transformation, the resident allele in the target strain is replaced by creating a duplication of the new allele. Selection for direct repeat recombinants results in a single copy of the new allele in the target strain. Specifically, the desired allele is amplified by PCR with a pair of adaptamers, which are chimeric oligonucleotides that are used to amplify the allele and differentially tag its 5′ and 3′ ends. These tags allow the directed fusion to two different, but overlapping, regions of an appropriately tagged selectable/counterselectable marker after a second round of PCR amplification. Following cotransformation of the two fusion fragments into yeast, homologous recombination efficiently generates a duplication of the amplified allele flanking the intact selectable marker in the genome. After counterselection, only the desired allele is retained as a result of direct repeat recombination. A simple modification of this method allows the creation of de novo mutations in the genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase
Lisby, M., Rothstein, R., & Mortensen, U. H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.121006298 · Cited by 462
Self-citationIn vivo site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides
Storici, F., Lewis, L. K., & Resnick, M. A. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/90837 · Cited by 332
Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions
Onge, R. P. S., Mani, R., Oh, J., Proctor, M., Fung, E., Davis, R. W., Nislow, C., Roth, F. P., & Giaever, G. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1948 · Cited by 309
Rodriguez, A., Kildegaard, K. R., Li, M., Borodina, I., & Nielsen, J. (2015) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2015.08.003 · Cited by 270
A Lecithin Cholesterol Acyltransferase-like Gene Mediates Diacylglycerol Esterification in Yeast
Oelkers, P., Tinkelenberg, A., Erdeniz, N., Cromley, D., Billheimer, J. T., & Sturley, S. L. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c000144200 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdeniz, N., Mortensen, U. H., & Rothstein, R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1174-1183
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2102865022
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning-Free PCR-Based Allele Replacement Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.7.12.1174
- The paper
- Erdeniz, N., Mortensen, U. H., & Rothstein, R. (1997). Cloning-Free PCR-Based Allele Replacement Methods. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7.12.1174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.