Cited by 224Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Strategies and tools for whole-genome alignments

Open access
Couronne, Olivier, Poliakov, Alexander, Bray, Nicolas, Ishkhanov, Tigran, Ryaboy, Dmitriy, Rubin, Edward, Pachter, Lior, Dubchak, Inna·2003·Genome Research

Abstract

The availability of the assembled mouse genome makes possible, for the first time, an alignment and comparison of two large vertebrate genomes. We investigated different strategies of alignment for the subsequent analysis of conservation of genomes that are effective for assemblies of different quality. These strategies were applied to the comparison of the working draft of the human genome with the Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium assembly, as well as other intermediate mouse assemblies. Our methods are fast and the resulting alignments exhibit a high degree of sensitivity, covering more than 90% of known coding exons in the human genome. We obtained such coverage while preserving specificity. With a view towards the end user, we developed a suite of tools and Web sites for automatically aligning and subsequently browsing and working with whole-genome comparisons. We describe the use of these tools to identify conserved non-coding regions between the human and mouse genomes, some of which have not been identified by other methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.762503

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the rapid advancements in sequencing technologies and the ever-increasing amount of genomic data, the development of efficient and accurate WGA algorithms has become more critical than ever.

    “With the rapid advancements in sequencing technologies and the ever-increasing amount of genomic data, the development of efficient and accurate WGA algorithms has become more critical than ever [67].”

    From Whole-Genome Alignment: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Abstract (page not available) says large genomes make many existing alignment algorithms inefficient and complicate accurate identification of orthologous regions; it presents a rapid, specific whole-genome alignment method. The paper does not establish that advances in sequencing technology or an ever-increasing volume of genomic data have made algorithm development more critical than ever. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lawn, R.M., Schwartz, K., and Patthy, L. 1997. Convergent evolution of apolipoprotein(a) in primates and hedgehog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 11992-11997.
  2. WEB SITE REFERENCES http://pipeline.lbl.gov; comparative analysis pipeline gateway at Lawrence Berkeley National laboratory. http://pipeline.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/cnc; database of conserved sequences from LBNL, PSU, and UCSC. http://bio.math.berkeley.edu/avid; Avid Web site. http://genome.ucsc.edu/; UCSC Web site from which the human genome assemblies used in this study where downloaded. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/; NCBI Locus Link. http://pipeline.lbl.gov/downloads.shtml; Download page for whole- genome alignments and other materials. http://www.ensembl.org; The ENSEMBL project Web site. http://pipeline.lbl.gov/das.shtnl; Alignment DAS server. http://bio.cse.psu.edu; BLASTZ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Couronne, O., Poliakov, A., Bray, N., Ishkhanov, T., Ryaboy, D., Rubin, E., Pachter, L., & Dubchak, I.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
73-80
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W4301509649
Cited by
224
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC03-?, AC03-76SF00098, DEAC03-76SF00098)
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Office of Science (DEAC03-76SF00098)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
whole-genome alignment, genome conservation, alignment tools, comparative genomics, genome assembly quality
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Chromosomes, Chromosomes, Human, Computer Communication Networks, Humans, Research Design, Software, Genome, Human, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Internet, Databases, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review