The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated De Novo Identification of Repeat Sequence Families in Sequenced Genomes
Open accessAbstract
Repetitive sequences make up a major part of eukaryotic genomes. We have developed an approach for the de novo identification and classification of repeat sequence families that is based on extensions to the usual approach of single linkage clustering of local pairwise alignments between genomic sequences. Our extensions use multiple alignment information to define the boundaries of individual copies of the repeats and to distinguish homologous but distinct repeat element families. When tested on the human genome, our approach was able to properly identify and group known transposable elements. The program,RECON, should be useful for first-pass automatic classification of repeats in newly sequenced genomes. [The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: R. Klein.]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment.
Morgenstern, B. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.3.211 · Cited by 678
Cited by
Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y., & Pevzner, P. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 · Cited by 5,986
RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families
Flynn, J. M., Hubley, R., Goubert, C., Rosen, J., Clark, A. G., Feschotte, C., & Smit, A. F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921046117 · Cited by 3,848
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
Vieler, A., Wu, G., Tsai, C.-H., Bullard, B., Cornish, A. J., Harvey, C., Reca, I.-B., Thornburg, C., Achawanantakun, R., Buehl, C. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003064 · Cited by 458
Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears
Liu, S., Lorenzen, E. D., Fumagalli, M., Li, B., Harris, K., Xiong, Z., Zhou, L., Korneliussen, T. S., Somel, M., Babbitt, C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.054 · Cited by 411
Complete Genomic Structure of the Bloom-forming Toxic Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843
Kaneko, T., Nakajima, N., Okamoto, S., Suzuki, I., Tanabe, Y., Tamaoki, M., Nakamura, Y., Kasai, F., Watanabe, A., Kawashima, K., et al. (2007) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsm026 · Cited by 284
Jiang, N., Feschotte, C., Zhang, X., & Wessler, S. R. (2004) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.01.004 · Cited by 173
Makałowski, W., Gotea, V., Pande, A., & Makałowska, I. (2019) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9074-0_6 · Cited by 127
Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements: discovery, distribution, and activity
Fattash, I., Rooke, R., Wong, A., Hui, C., Luu, T., Bhardwaj, P., & Yang, G. (2013) · Genome · doi:10.1139/gen-2012-0174 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, Z., & Eddy, S. R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2002-07-19
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1269-1276
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2151899848
- Cited by
- 983
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
