The DOI matches its Crossref record.
eVOC: A Controlled Vocabulary for Unifying Gene Expression Data
Open accessAbstract
Expression data contribute significantly to the biological value of the sequenced human genome,providing extensive information about gene structure and the pattern of gene expression. ESTs,together with SAGE libraries and microarray experiment information,provide a broad and rich view of the transcriptome. However, it is difficult to perform large-scale expression mining of the data generated by these diverse experimental approaches. Not only is the data stored in disparate locations,but there is frequent ambiguity in the meaning of terms used to describe the source of the material used in the experiment. Untangling semantic differences between the data provided by different resources is therefore largely reliant on the domain knowledge of a human expert. We present here eVOC,a system which associates labelled target cDNAs for microarray experiments,or cDNA libraries and their associated transcripts with controlled terms in a set of hierarchical vocabularies. eVOC consists of four orthogonal controlled vocabularies suitable for describing the domains of human gene expression data including Anatomical System,Cell Type,Pathology and Developmental Stage. We have curated and annotated 7016 cDNA libraries represented in dbEST,as well as 104 SAGE libraries,with expression information,and provide this as an integrated,public resource that allows the linking of transcripts and libraries with expression terms. Both the vocabularies and the vocabulary-annotated libraries can be retrieved from http://www.sanbi.ac.za/evoc/. Several groups are involved in developing this resource with the aim of unifying transcript expression information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Function of alternative splicing
Stamm, S., Ben-Ari, S., Rafalska, I., Tang, Y., Zhang, Z., Toiber, D., Thanaraj, T. A., & Soreq, H. (2005) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2004.10.022 · Cited by 1,377
The Ensembl Automatic Gene Annotation System
Curwen, V., Eyras, E., Andrews, T. D., Clarke, L., Mongin, E., Searle, S. M. J., & Clamp, M. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1858004 · Cited by 400
neXtProt: Organizing Protein Knowledge in the Context of Human Proteome Projects
Gaudet, P., Argoud-Puy, G., Cusin, I., Duek, P., Evalet, O., Gateau, A., Gleizes, A., Pereira, M., Zahn-Zabal, M., Zwahlen, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr300830v · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelso, J., Visagie, J., Theiler, G., Christoffels, A., Bardien, S., Smedley, D., Otgaar, D., Greyling, G., Jongeneel, C. V., McCarthy, M. I., Hide, T., & Hide, W.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6a
- Pages
- 1222-1230
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152545090
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: eVOC: A Controlled Vocabulary for Unifying Gene Expression Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.985203
- The paper
- Kelso, J., Visagie, J., Theiler, G., Christoffels, A., Bardien, S., Smedley, D., Otgaar, D., Greyling, G., Jongeneel, C. V., McCarthy, M. I., Hide, T., & Hide, W. (2003). eVOC: A Controlled Vocabulary for Unifying Gene Expression Data. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.985203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.