Race, Ethnicity, and Genomics: Social Classifications as Proxies of Biological Heterogeneity
Open accessAbstract
Over the past century, genetics has experienced a tension between the view that racial and ethnic categories are biologically meaningful and the view that these social classifications have little or no biological significance. That tension continues to inform genomics and is evident in the assembly of biological collections and sequence databases that seek to approximate the genetic variation found in human populations. Although social identities can be useful and convenient proxies of some biological features, for example, in ensuring that genomic resources capture a range of genetic variants found in most human populations, the ways in which geneticists conceptualize the relationship between racial and ethnic identities and genetic variation can be problematic. Inclusion of racial and ethnic identifiers in genomic resources can create risks for all members of those identified populations and influence lay perceptions of the nature of racial and ethnic groups. Thus, the burden of showing the scientific utility of racial and ethic identities in the construction and analysis of genomic resources falls on researchers. This requires that genetic researchers pay as much attention to the social constitution of human populations as presently is paid to their genetic composition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of race as a natural category can obfuscate the environmental, social, and structural factors that contribute to health disparities and lead to the racialization of certain diseases.
“For example, the use of race as a natural category can obfuscate the environmental, social, and structural factors that contribute to health disparities [29, 110] and lead to the racialization of certain diseases [19, 30, 37].”
From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 200
- Authors
- Foster, M. W., & Sharp, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Sharp, Richard R.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 844-850
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2139243023
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AI24717, ES11174)
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 24717-S2)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES011174, ES 11174)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- race, ethnicity, genomics, genetic variation, biological heterogeneity, genomic resources, population genetic variation, social categorization, genetic ancestry, bioethics
- MeSH terms
- Ethnicity, Humans, Social Class, Genetic Heterogeneity, Genomics, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review