The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contigs Built with Fingerprints, Markers, and FPC V4.7
Open accessAbstract
Contigs have been assembled, and over 2800 clones selected for sequencing for human chromosomes 9, 10 and 13. Using the FPC (FingerPrinted Contig) software, the contigs are assembled with markers and complete digest fingerprints, and the contigs are ordered and localised by a global framework. Publicly available resources have been used, such as, the 1998 International Gene Map for the framework and the GSC Human BAC fingerprint database for the majority of the fingerprints. Additional markers and fingerprints are generated in-house to supplement this data. To support the scale up of building maps, FPC V4.7 has been extended to use markers with the fingerprints for assembly of contigs, new clones and markers can be automatically added to existing contigs, and poorly assembled contigs are marked accordingly. To test the automatic assembly, a simulated complete digest of 110 Mb of concatenated human sequence was used to create datasets with varying coverage, length of clones, and types of error. When no error was introduced and a tolerance of 7 was used in assembly, the largest contig with no false positive overlaps has 9534 clones with 37 out-of-order clones, that is, the starting coordinates of adjacent clones are in the wrong order. This paper describes the new features in FPC, the scenario for building the maps of chromosomes 9, 10 and 13, and the results from the simulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome
The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11543 · Cited by 1,456
The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A Platform for Comparative Genomics
Stein, L. D., Bao, Z., Blasiar, D., Blumenthal, T., Brent, M. R., Chen, N., Chinwalla, A., Clarke, L., Clee, C., Coghlan, A., et al. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000045 · Cited by 940
Physical and Genetic Structure of the Maize Genome Reflects Its Complex Evolutionary History
Wei, F., Coe, E., Nelson, W., Bharti, A. K., Engler, F., Butler, E., Kim, H., Goicoechea, J. L., Chen, M., Lee, S., et al. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030123 · Cited by 299
Self-citationYoung inversion with multiple linked QTLs under selection in a hybrid zone
Lee, C.-R., Wang, B., Mojica, J. P., Mandáková, T., Prasad, K. V. S. K., Goicoechea, J. L., Perera, N., Hellsten, U., Hundley, H. N., Johnson, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0119 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Soderlund, C.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1772-1787
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150355185
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contigs Built with Fingerprints, Markers, and FPC V4.7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.gr-1375r
- The paper
- Soderlund, C. (2000). Contigs Built with Fingerprints, Markers, and FPC V4.7. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.gr-1375r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.