PreprintCited by 106Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The medial dorsal thalamic nucleus and the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat function together to support associative recognition and recency but not item recognition

Open access
Cross, Laura, Brown, Malcolm W., Aggleton, John P., Warburton, E. Clea·2013·Learning & Memory

Abstract

In humans recognition memory deficits, a typical feature of diencephalic amnesia, have been tentatively linked to mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) damage. Animal studies have occasionally investigated the role of the MD in single-item recognition, but have not systematically analyzed its involvement in other recognition memory processes. In Experiment 1 rats with bilateral excitotoxic lesions in the MD or the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were tested in tasks that assessed single-item recognition (novel object preference), associative recognition memory (object-in-place), and recency discrimination (recency memory task). Experiment 2 examined the functional importance of the interactions between the MD and mPFC using disconnection techniques. Unilateral excitotoxic lesions were placed in both the MD and the mPFC in either the same (MD + mPFC Ipsi) or opposite hemispheres (MD + mPFC Contra group). Bilateral lesions in the MD or mPFC impaired object-in-place and recency memory tasks, but had no effect on novel object preference. In Experiment 2 the MD + mPFC Contra group was significantly impaired in the object-in-place and recency memory tasks compared with the MD + mPFC Ipsi group, but novel object preference was intact. Thus, connections between the MD and mPFC are critical for recognition memory when the discriminations involve associative or recency information. However, the rodent MD is not necessary for single-item recognition memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.028266.112

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 106

Authors
Cross, L., Brown, M. W., Aggleton, J. P., & Warburton, E. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Warburton, E. Clea
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2106682404
Cited by
106
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/100310X/1, BB/E010407/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, recognition memory, associative recognition memory, novel object preference, excitotoxic lesions, diencephalic amnesia, rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Discrimination, Psychological, Electrolysis, Exploratory Behavior, Functional Laterality, Male, Neural Pathways, Space Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Midline Thalamic Nuclei, Recognition, Psychology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review