Cited by 3Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systemsQuantum and electron transport phenomena

Anyonization of Bosons in One Dimension: An Effective Swap Model

Open access
Wang, Botao, Vashisht, Amit, Guo, Yanliang, Dhar, Sudipta, Landini, Manuele, Nägerl, Hanns-Christoph, Goldman, Nathan·2025·Physical Review Letters

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Anyons emerge as elementary excitations in low-dimensional quantum systems and exhibit behavior distinct from bosons or fermions. In one dimension, anyons can arise from unconventional scattering processes or density-dependent hopping on a lattice. Here, we introduce a novel framework for realizing anyonic correlations using the internal degrees of freedom of a spinor quantum gas. We propose a “swap” model, which assigns a complex phase factor to the swapping processes between two different species, referred to as “host particles” and “impurities.” The anyonic characteristics are demonstrated through the one-body correlator of the impurity, using a spin-charge separation analysis. The impurity plays the role of both creating and directly probing the anyonic correlations in a quantum many-body system, which are not accessible in the conventional anyon-Hubbard model. For a single impurity, our framework can be effectively implemented by applying tilt potentials in a strongly interacting quantum gas [Dhar , Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas, .]. We further explore the dynamical properties of anyonic correlations and extend our analysis to the case of multiple impurities. Our Letter provides new avenues for engineering many-body anyonic behavior in quantum simulation platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/2np8-mp39

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, B., Vashisht, A., Guo, Y., Dhar, S., Landini, M., Nägerl, H.-C., & Goldman, N.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Wang, Botao
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-12-17
Volume
135
Issue
25
Pages
253403-253403
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W4417268495
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Research Council (789017, 101201611)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (2.5020.11)
  • Austrian Science Fund (Z336-N36, 10.55776/COE1)
  • Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FO999896041)
  • Waalse Gewest
  • Fondation ULB
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
Keywords
anyons, one-dimensional bosons, SWAP model, impurities, spin-charge separation, quantum simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review