Cited by 2Machine Learning in Materials SciencePhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language-inspired machine learning approach for solving strongly correlated problems with dynamical mean-field theory

Open access
Lee, Hovan, Zhao, Zelong, Booth, George H., Ge, Weifeng, Weber, Cedric·2025·Physical Review B

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present SCALINN—strongly correlated approach with language-inspired neural network—as a method for solving the Anderson impurity model and reducing the computational cost of dynamical mean-field theory calculations. Inspired by the success of generative Transformer networks in natural language processing, SCALINN utilizes an in-house modified Transformer network in order to learn correlated Matsubara Green's functions, which act as solutions to the impurity model. This is achieved by providing the network with low-cost Matsubara Green's functions, thereby overcoming the computational cost of high accuracy solutions. Across different temperatures and interaction strengths, the performance of SCALINN is demonstrated in both physical observables (spectral function, Matsubara Green's functions, quasiparticle weight), and the mean squared error cost values of the neural network, showcasing the network's ability to accelerate Green's function based calculations of correlated materials by predicting DMFT solver solutions, which—given a sufficiently comprehensive training database—can be applied across materials and regimes, enabling DFT + DMFT calculations without prior knowledge of the material properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/bk5q-pfb2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.017001 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184510 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41586-019-1463-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aat4134 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41586-020-2910-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035125 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.043402 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045139 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.106402 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRev.124.41 · DOI
  13. 10.1098/rspa.1964.0019 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.235123 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155107 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076405 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.035122 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1545 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245116 · DOI
  20. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/5/053201 · DOI
  21. A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  22. 10.1088/1361-6633/aab406 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.abj6511 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.056401 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155136 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.205120 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013101 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075145 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035147 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.235115 · DOI
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/bk5q-pfb2 for taking note of the different positional encoding techniques in the concatenation and addition methods of the Matsubara frequencies.
  33. 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.023 · DOI
  34. 10.1063/1.5144261 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075129 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245118 · DOI
  37. 10.3938/NPSM.72.487 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.241105 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.035143 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115111 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115136 · DOI
  42. A. Paszke, 2017, Openreview
  43. 10.21105/joss.07425 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lee, H., Zhao, Z., Booth, G. H., Ge, W., & Weber, C.
Affiliations
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • King's College London
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2025-07-24
Volume
112
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W4412403343
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA8655-22-1-7011)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T022213/1, EP/W032260/1, EP/P020194/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
strongly correlated electrons, dynamical mean-field theory, Anderson model, transformer models, Matsubara Green's function, computational complexity reduction, spectral function, quasiparticle weight, DFT+DMFT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review