The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language-inspired machine learning approach for solving strongly correlated problems with dynamical mean-field theory
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We present SCALINN—strongly correlated approach with language-inspired neural network—as a method for solving the Anderson impurity model and reducing the computational cost of dynamical mean-field theory calculations. Inspired by the success of generative Transformer networks in natural language processing, SCALINN utilizes an in-house modified Transformer network in order to learn correlated Matsubara Green's functions, which act as solutions to the impurity model. This is achieved by providing the network with low-cost Matsubara Green's functions, thereby overcoming the computational cost of high accuracy solutions. Across different temperatures and interaction strengths, the performance of SCALINN is demonstrated in both physical observables (spectral function, Matsubara Green's functions, quasiparticle weight), and the mean squared error cost values of the neural network, showcasing the network's ability to accelerate Green's function based calculations of correlated materials by predicting DMFT solver solutions, which—given a sufficiently comprehensive training database—can be applied across materials and regimes, enabling DFT + DMFT calculations without prior knowledge of the material properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t ′
Jiang, H.-C., & Devereaux, T. P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal5304 · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.017001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184510 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1463-1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aat4134 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2910-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035125 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.043402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045139 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.106402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.124.41 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspa.1964.0019 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.235123 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155107 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.035122 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1545 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245116 · DOI
- 10.1088/0953-8984/24/5/053201 · DOI
- A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- 10.1088/1361-6633/aab406 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj6511 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.056401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155136 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.205120 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013101 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075145 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035147 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.235115 · DOI
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/bk5q-pfb2 for taking note of the different positional encoding techniques in the concatenation and addition methods of the Matsubara frequencies.
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.023 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5144261 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075129 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245118 · DOI
- 10.3938/NPSM.72.487 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.241105 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.035143 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115136 · DOI
- A. Paszke, 2017, Openreview
- 10.21105/joss.07425 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, H., Zhao, Z., Booth, G. H., Ge, W., & Weber, C.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Fudan University (CN)
- King's College London
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2025-07-24
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W4412403343
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA8655-22-1-7011)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T022213/1, EP/W032260/1, EP/P020194/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- strongly correlated electrons, dynamical mean-field theory, Anderson model, transformer models, Matsubara Green's function, computational complexity reduction, spectral function, quasiparticle weight, DFT+DMFT
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review