Cited by 0Neural Networks and Reservoir ComputingStrong Light-Matter InteractionsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polaritonic machine learning for graph-based data analysis

Open access
Wang, Yuan, Scali, Stefano, Kyriienko, Oleksandr·2026·Physical Review E

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Photonic and polaritonic systems offer a fast and efficient platform for accelerating machine learning (ML) through physics-based computing. To gain a computational advantage, however, polaritonic systems must meet the following: (1) exploit features that specifically favor nonlinear optical processing; (2) address problems that are computationally hard and depend on these features; and (3) integrate photonic processing within broader ML pipelines. In this work, we propose a polaritonic machine learning approach for solving graph-based data problems. We demonstrate how lattices of condensates can efficiently embed relational and topological information from point cloud datasets. This information is then incorporated into a pattern recognition workflow based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), leading to significantly improved learning performance compared to physics-agnostic methods. Our extensive benchmarking shows that photonic machine learning achieves over 90% accuracy for Betti number classification and clique detection tasks, a substantial improvement over the 35% accuracy of bare CNNs. Our study introduces a distinct way of using photonic systems as fast tools for feature engineering, while building on top of high-performing digital machine learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/fgy1-n4vp

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 121

  1. A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
  2. T. Brown, 2020, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33, 1877
  3. 10.1126/sciadv.1602614 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-023-06559-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1142/S2811032322500047 · DOI
  6. A. Krizhevsky, 2012, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25
  7. 10.4208/cicp.OA-2018-0035 · DOI
  8. M. Zhang, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  9. J. Sevilla, 2022, 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
  10. 10.1038/d41586-025-01113-z · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-025-57352-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1088/2399-1984/ad299a · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.042202 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s42254-023-00645-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41377-024-01590-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1117/1.AP.7.2.024001 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.aat8084 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41586-020-03070-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41586-021-04223-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.ade8450 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41566-023-01170-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41467-022-33386-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41467-024-51509-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41467-024-54931-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-024-55058-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1515/nanoph-2025-0001 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1489 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.299 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.crhy.2016.05.004 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035306 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.10830 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115409 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s42005-019-0278-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023033 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41467-025-61607-2 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/r8m8-hckx · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.227402 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/sciadv.aat8880 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41467-022-33940-3 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41467-023-39358-9 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195435 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41467-021-22537-x · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41377-024-01382-9 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245302 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41467-020-17340-z · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021011 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.197402 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41467-023-41079-y · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s41586-021-03228-5 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41377-023-01268-2 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.207401 · DOI
  53. 10.1088/1361-648X/ae20e5 · DOI
  54. 10.1103/gr72-szwg · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nphys2999 · DOI
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.047402 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nature05131 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nature12036 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s42254-022-00447-1 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/nphys1051 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/nature07640 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/nphys1668 · DOI
  63. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.126402 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/nphys1841 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/s41467-020-14702-5 · DOI
  66. 10.1126/sciadv.add1299 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/sciadv.adj1589 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.267 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/ncomms9317 · DOI
  70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085413 · DOI
  71. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041028 · DOI
  72. 10.1364/OME.414890 · DOI
  73. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/035032 · DOI
  74. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.097401 · DOI
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195301 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/s41467-020-16656-0 · DOI
  77. 10.1002/advs.202400672 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/s41563-024-01980-3 · DOI
  79. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.186403 · DOI
  80. 10.1038/nmat4971 · DOI
  81. 10.1038/s41467-021-25845-4 · DOI
  82. 10.1063/5.0180272 · DOI
  83. 10.1002/adom.202500304 · DOI
  84. 10.1364/OME.496985 · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064029 · DOI
  86. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00435 · DOI
  87. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04696 · DOI
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.054037 · DOI
  89. 10.1038/s41377-024-01719-4 · DOI
  90. 10.1002/adma.202507612 · DOI
  91. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.024045 · DOI
  92. 10.1038/s41534-019-0149-8 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009716 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/qute.202100053 · DOI
  95. 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042402 · DOI
  96. 10.1038/s41566-022-01019-6 · DOI
  97. 10.1038/s41563-019-0282-y · DOI
  98. 10.1038/s41563-019-0281-z · DOI
  99. C. Ying, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  100. L. Ma, 2023, Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
  101. 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045 · DOI
  102. 10.1038/ncomms10138 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.22331/q-2022-12-07-873 · DOI
  104. 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042616 · DOI
  105. 10.1063/5.0209201 · DOI
  106. H. Edelsbrunner, 2009, Computational Topology: An Introduction, 10.1090/mbk/069 · DOI
  107. 10.3389/frai.2021.667963 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/0010-4485(88)90138-8 · DOI
  109. 10.1007/s00454-013-9557-2 · DOI
  110. 10.1002/nme.2135 · DOI
  111. 10.1145/3321515 · DOI
  112. R. E. Bank, 1983, Scientific Computing, IMACS Trans. Sci. Comput., 1, 3
  113. 10.1007/BF02760024 · DOI
  114. R. M. Karp, 1972, Complexity of Computer Computations
  115. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · DOI · Paper page
  116. S. Ioffe, 2015, International Conference on Machine Learning
  117. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.140402 · DOI
  118. 10.1364/OPTICA.409976 · DOI
  119. M. Bern, 2000, Handbook of Computational Geometry
  120. 10.1103/PhysRev.112.1555 · DOI
  121. D. Kinga, 2015, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Scali, S., & Kyriienko, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2026-08-26
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
025305-025305
ISSN
  • 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0053
OpenAlex
W7172496691
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. E (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X017222/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
point cloud data, clique detection, nonlinear optical processing, convolutional neural networks, feature engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review