Quasinormal modes and their excitation beyond general relativity. II. Isospectrality loss in gravitational waveforms
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We continue our series of papers where we study the quasinormal modes, and their excitation, of black holes in the simplest beyond general relativity model in which first-principle calculations are tractable: a nonrotating black hole in an effective-field-theory extension of general relativity with cubic-in-curvature terms. In this theory, the equivalence between the quasinormal mode spectra associated with metric perturbations of polar and axial parities (“isospectrality”) of the Schwarzschild black hole in general relativity no longer holds. How does this loss of isospectrality translate into the time-domain ringdown of gravitational waves? Given such a ringdown, can we identify the two “fundamental quasinormal modes” associated to the two metric-perturbation parities? We study these questions through a large suite of time-domain numerical simulations, by a prescription on how to relate the gauge-invariant master functions that describe metric perturbations of each parity with the gravitational polarizations. Under the assumptions made in our calculations, we find that it is in general difficult to identify either of the two fundamental modes from the time series, although finding evidence for a non-general-relativistic mode is possible sometimes. We discuss our results in light of our assumptions and speculate about what may occur when they are relaxed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Silva, H. O., Tambalo, G., Glampedakis, K., & Yagi, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Universidad de Murcia (ES)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2026-04-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W7135038678
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (386119226)
- National Science Foundation (PHY-2309066, PHYS-2339969)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- quasinormal modes, Schwarzschild black hole, isospectrality, beyond general relativity, effective field theory of gravity, gravitational waveforms, ringdown, metric perturbations, gravitational polarization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review